Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGAX vs FSMAX
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGAX vs FSMAX
BMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGAX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BMGAX (5.07B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BMGAX (0.00). BMGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGAX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BMGAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. BMGAX (-23.80). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. BMGAX (-34.16).
| BMGAX | FSMAX | BMGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.04 | 3,171% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.524 | 16.937 | -50% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 40.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.80 | 23.68 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.15 | 72.74 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.16 | 40.14 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.87 | 134.49 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement