Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGCX vs FSMAX
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGCX vs FSMAX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Inv C
Price$24.58
Change+$0.49 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.6B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$98.35
Change+$1.64 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. BMGCX (6.6B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs BMGCX (0.00). BMGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGCX (29 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. BMGCX (-15.80). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.08 vs. BMGCX (-9.13).
| BMGCX | FSMAX | BMGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.04 | 5,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.446 | 8.220 | -127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.6B | 41.5B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.80 | 0.14 | -11,428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.61 | 50.25 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.13 | 31.08 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.26 | 93.98 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement