Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGCX vs FSMAX
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGCX vs FSMAX
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. BMGCX (5.61B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BMGCX (0.00). BMGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGCX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. BMGCX (-19.81). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. BMGCX (-30.95).
| BMGCX | FSMAX | BMGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.04 | 5,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.191 | 15.427 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 42.7B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.81 | 29.23 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.84 | 73.83 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.95 | 33.65 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.67 | 153.47 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers