Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGCX vs FSMAX
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGCX vs FSMAX
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BMGCX (4.99B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BMGCX (0.00). BMGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGCX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.77 vs. BMGCX (-39.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.45 vs. BMGCX (-50.92).
| BMGCX | FSMAX | BMGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.04 | 5,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.943 | 17.999 | -105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.99B | 40.1B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -39.13 | 19.77 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.16 | 69.63 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.92 | 35.45 | -144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.24 | 137.27 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement