Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGCX vs FSMAX
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGCX vs FSMAX
BMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. BMGCX (5.12B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs BMGCX (0.00). BMGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGCX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. BMGCX (-39.61). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.56 vs. BMGCX (-49.42).
| BMGCX | FSMAX | BMGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.04 | 5,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.610 | 13.698 | -143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.12B | 43.5B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -39.61 | 20.08 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.56 | 58.16 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.42 | 33.56 | -147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.42 | 132.04 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers