Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMGKX vs FSMAX
BMGKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMGKX vs FSMAX
BMGKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMGKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGKX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BMGKX (5.07B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMGKX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BMGKX (0.00). BMGKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMGKX (10 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BMGKX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMGKX: FSMAX (0) vs BMGKX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. BMGKX (-22.41). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. BMGKX (-29.52).
| BMGKX | FSMAX | BMGKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.04 | 2,029% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.04 | 2,029% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.876 | 13.370 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 40.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.41 | 20.57 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.13 | 55.83 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.52 | 33.18 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.20 | 133.82 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers