BMGL
Price
$6.14
Change
-$0.59 (-8.77%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.61M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CON
Price
$31.39
Change
-$0.16 (-0.51%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.02B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMGL vs CON

BMGL vs CON Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMGL vs. CON commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGL is a StrongBuy and CON is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BMGL: $6.14 vs. CON: $31.39)
Brand notoriety: BMGL and CON are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMGL: 0% vs. CON: 72%
Market capitalization -- BMGL: $9.61M vs. CON: $4.02B
BMGL [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $9.61M. CON’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $86.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCON’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BMGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CON’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the long-term than BMGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMGL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CON’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMGL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMGL is a better buy in the short-term than CON.

Price Growth

BMGL (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -12.78% price change this week, while CON (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

CON is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-1.57% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CON($4.02B) has a higher market cap than BMGL($9.61M). BMGL has higher P/E ratio than CON: BMGL (155.24) vs CON (22.58). CON YTD gains are higher at: 60.332 vs. BMGL (4.422). CON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 428M vs. BMGL (-9.67M). CON has higher revenues than BMGL: CON (2.23B) vs BMGL (11.3M).
BMGLCONBMGL / CON
Capitalization9.61M4.02B0%
EBITDA-9.67M428M-2%
Gain YTD4.42260.3327%
P/E Ratio155.2422.58687%
Revenue11.3M2.23B1%
Total CashN/A61.7M-
Total DebtN/A2.12B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMGLCON
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMGL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTMU7.87-0.01
-0.11%
Franklin Municipal Income ETF
IGI16.07-0.02
-0.12%
Western Asset Investment Grade Opportunity Trust Inc
DDM65.92-0.34
-0.51%
ProShares Ultra Dow30
ICVT116.38-1.54
-1.31%
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
BCCC11.60-0.24
-2.04%
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF

CON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CON has been loosely correlated with PNTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CON jumps, then PNTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CON
1D Price
Change %
CON100%
-0.51%
PNTG - CON
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
NHC - CON
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
HCA - CON
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.90%
UHS - CON
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
ARDT - CON
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
More