Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMICX vs CBVZX
BMICX vs CBVZX Comparison
Open Charts BMICX vs CBVZX
BlackRock Managed Income Investor C
Price$9.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets819.66M
Columbia Capital Allocation Cnsrv Inst
Price$9.72
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.56M
BMICX vs CBVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMICX vs. CBVZX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMICX is a Hold and CBVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMICX has more cash in the bank: 820M vs. CBVZX (153M). BMICX pays higher dividends than CBVZX: BMICX (4.68) vs CBVZX (3.34). BMICX was incepted earlier than CBVZX: BMICX (9 years) vs CBVZX (15 years). BMICX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CBVZX (0.69). BMICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. CBVZX (7.00). BMICX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: BMICX (1000) vs CBVZX (2000). CBVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. BMICX (5.43). BMICX return over 5 years is better than : 15.97 vs. CBVZX (7.30).
| BMICX | CBVZX | BMICX / CBVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.69 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.69 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.962 | 8.335 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 820M | 153M | 536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.68 | 3.34 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.43 | 6.93 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.20 | 23.48 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | 7.30 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers