BMNM
Price
$1.10
Change
-$0.07 (-5.98%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.58M
BRSGF
Price
$6.00
Change
+$0.40 (+7.14%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
240.88M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMNM vs BRSGF

Header iconBMNM vs BRSGF Comparison
Open Charts BMNM vs BRSGFBanner chart's image
Bimini Capital Management
Price$1.10
Change-$0.07 (-5.98%)
Volume$841
Capitalization11.58M
Queens Rd Cap Invt
Price$6.00
Change+$0.40 (+7.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization240.88M
BMNM vs BRSGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMNM vs. BRSGF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMNM is a Hold and BRSGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BMNM: $1.15 vs. BRSGF: $6.00)
Brand notoriety: BMNM and BRSGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMNM: 24% vs. BRSGF: 67%
Market capitalization -- BMNM: $11.58M vs. BRSGF: $240.88M
BMNM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $11.58M. BRSGF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $240.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMNM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBRSGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMNM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BRSGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRSGF is a better buy in the long-term than BMNM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMNM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BRSGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMNM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BRSGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRSGF is a better buy in the short-term than BMNM.

Price Growth

BMNM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -8.00% price change this week, while BRSGF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRSGF($241M) has a higher market cap than BMNM($11.6M). BRSGF YTD gains are higher at: 13.208 vs. BMNM (10.000). BMNM has less debt than BRSGF: BMNM (27.4M) vs BRSGF (31.8M).
BMNMBRSGFBMNM / BRSGF
Capitalization11.6M241M5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.00013.20876%
P/E RatioN/A4.78-
Revenue13.4MN/A-
Total CashN/A12.9M-
Total Debt27.4M31.8M86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMNM vs BRSGF: Fundamental Ratings
BMNM
BRSGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8768
SMR RATING
1..100
9422
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
785

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRSGF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMNM (84). This means that BRSGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNM (87). This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMNM (94). This means that BRSGF’s stock grew significantly faster than BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNM (53). This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

BMNM's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRSGF (93). This means that BMNM’s stock grew significantly faster than BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMNMBRSGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL256.874.56
+1.81%
Apple
SPY658.05-3.05
-0.46%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
GME25.27-0.98
-3.73%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X109049.290000-4279.343800
-3.78%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA423.39-19.40
-4.38%
Tesla

BMNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMNM and AZIHF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMNM and AZIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMNM
1D Price
Change %
BMNM100%
-6.38%
AZIHF - BMNM
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
AHFCF - BMNM
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AABVF - BMNM
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRSGF - BMNM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDUF - BMNM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BRSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRSGF has been loosely correlated with TGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRSGF jumps, then TGE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRSGF
1D Price
Change %
BRSGF100%
N/A
TGE - BRSGF
49%
Loosely correlated
-11.74%
CWD - BRSGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
OWL - BRSGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
GEG - BRSGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGNX - BRSGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.26%
More