BMNR
Price
$29.09
Change
-$3.20 (-9.91%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WULF
Price
$12.22
Change
+$0.22 (+1.83%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.12B
127 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMNR vs WULF

Header iconBMNR vs WULF Comparison
Open Charts BMNR vs WULFBanner chart's image
BitMine Immersion Technologies
Price$29.09
Change-$3.20 (-9.91%)
Volume$348.26K
Capitalization9.19B
TeraWulf
Price$12.22
Change+$0.22 (+1.83%)
Volume$342.37K
Capitalization5.12B
BMNR vs WULF Comparison Chart in %
BMNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WULF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMNR vs. WULF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMNR is a Hold and WULF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BMNR: $32.28 vs. WULF: $11.99)
Brand notoriety: BMNR and WULF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMNR: 121% vs. WULF: 124%
Market capitalization -- BMNR: $8.31B vs. WULF: $5.12B
BMNR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.31B. WULF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMNR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWULF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMNR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WULF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMNR and WULF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMNR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WULF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMNR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WULF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BMNR and WULF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BMNR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -18.46% price change this week, while WULF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

WULF is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.88% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMNR($9.19B) has a higher market cap than WULF($5.12B). BMNR YTD gains are higher at: 313.846 vs. WULF (111.837). BMNR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.53M vs. WULF (-72.9M). WULF has more cash in the bank: 90M vs. BMNR (1.47M). BMNR has less debt than WULF: BMNR (1.88M) vs WULF (501M). WULF has higher revenues than BMNR: WULF (144M) vs BMNR (5.45M).
BMNRWULFBMNR / WULF
Capitalization9.19B5.12B180%
EBITDA-2.53M-72.9M3%
Gain YTD313.846111.837281%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.45M144M4%
Total Cash1.47M90M2%
Total Debt1.88M501M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMNR vs WULF: Fundamental Ratings
BMNR
WULF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8279
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WULF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNR (100). This means that WULF’s stock grew similarly to BMNR’s over the last 12 months.

WULF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNR (100). This means that WULF’s stock grew similarly to BMNR’s over the last 12 months.

WULF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNR (99). This means that WULF’s stock grew similarly to BMNR’s over the last 12 months.

BMNR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (37). This means that BMNR’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

BMNR's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (100). This means that BMNR’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMNRWULF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WULF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASRIX8.23N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Real Estate Income R5
GSFPX18.68N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium P
VVISX11.77-0.01
-0.08%
Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap Instl
CSPEX68.06-0.35
-0.51%
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529E
VCNIX26.50-0.32
-1.19%
VALIC Company I NASDAQ-100 Index

BMNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMNR and WULF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMNR and WULF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMNR
1D Price
Change %
BMNR100%
+4.30%
WULF - BMNR
12%
Poorly correlated
+8.51%
STKE - BMNR
11%
Poorly correlated
+10.45%
WAI - BMNR
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.52%
SLNHP - BMNR
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
BTM - BMNR
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
More