BMNR
Price
$48.41
Change
-$1.17 (-2.36%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.6B
WULF
Price
$10.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.5B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMNR vs WULF

Header iconBMNR vs WULF Comparison
Open Charts BMNR vs WULFBanner chart's image
BitMine Immersion Technologies
Price$48.41
Change-$1.17 (-2.36%)
Volume$17K
Capitalization8.6B
TeraWulf
Price$10.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.36K
Capitalization4.5B
BMNR vs WULF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WULF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMNR vs. WULF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMNR is a StrongBuy and WULF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BMNR: $49.57 vs. WULF: $10.97)
Brand notoriety: BMNR and WULF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMNR: 94% vs. WULF: 96%
Market capitalization -- BMNR: $8.6B vs. WULF: $4.5B
BMNR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.6B. WULF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMNR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWULF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMNR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WULF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMNR and WULF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMNR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WULF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMNR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WULF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMNR is a better buy in the short-term than WULF.

Price Growth

BMNR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -17.33% price change this week, while WULF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

WULF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMNR($8.6B) has a higher market cap than WULF($4.5B). BMNR YTD gains are higher at: 535.513 vs. WULF (93.816). BMNR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.53M vs. WULF (-72.9M). WULF has more cash in the bank: 90M vs. BMNR (1.47M). BMNR has less debt than WULF: BMNR (1.88M) vs WULF (501M). WULF has higher revenues than BMNR: WULF (144M) vs BMNR (5.45M).
BMNRWULFBMNR / WULF
Capitalization8.6B4.5B191%
EBITDA-2.53M-72.9M3%
Gain YTD535.51393.816571%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.45M144M4%
Total Cash1.47M90M2%
Total Debt1.88M501M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMNR vs WULF: Fundamental Ratings
BMNR
WULF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
622
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9884
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WULF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNR (100). This means that WULF’s stock grew similarly to BMNR’s over the last 12 months.

WULF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNR (98). This means that WULF’s stock grew similarly to BMNR’s over the last 12 months.

WULF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNR (99). This means that WULF’s stock grew similarly to BMNR’s over the last 12 months.

BMNR's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (35). This means that BMNR’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

BMNR's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (100). This means that BMNR’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMNRWULF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WULF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRIAX22.48N/A
N/A
Nuveen Real Asset Income A
BITSX30.30N/A
N/A
iShares Total US Stock Market Idx Instl
TRACX18.24N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val C
SNPTX20.93N/A
N/A
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Institutional
RWMFX66.35-0.38
-0.57%
American Funds Washington Mutual R5

BMNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMNR and WULF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMNR and WULF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMNR
1D Price
Change %
BMNR100%
-4.53%
WULF - BMNR
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
WAI - BMNR
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
SLNHP - BMNR
7%
Poorly correlated
-7.19%
STKE - BMNR
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
HOOD - BMNR
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.27%
More

WULF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WULF has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WULF jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WULF
1D Price
Change %
WULF100%
-3.77%
CIFR - WULF
73%
Closely correlated
-17.54%
HUT - WULF
72%
Closely correlated
-7.87%
RIOT - WULF
71%
Closely correlated
-6.95%
IREN - WULF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
BTBT - WULF
65%
Loosely correlated
-6.67%
More