Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMRRX vs FSMAX
BMRRX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMRRX vs FSMAX
BMRRX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMRRX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMRRX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BMRRX (4.62B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMRRX: FSMAX (0.49) vs BMRRX (0.00). BMRRX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMRRX (20 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BMRRX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMRRX: FSMAX (0) vs BMRRX (100). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. BMRRX (-33.54). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. BMRRX (-43.41).
| BMRRX | FSMAX | BMRRX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.04 | 3,714% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.04 | 4,057% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.786 | 13.370 | -118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.62B | 40.1B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -33.54 | 13.05 | -257% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.11 | 63.92 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.41 | 32.77 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.95 | 133.42 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement