Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMRRX vs FSMAX
BMRRX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMRRX vs FSMAX
BMRRX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMRRX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMRRX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BMRRX (5.07B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMRRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BMRRX (0.00). BMRRX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMRRX (20 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BMRRX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMRRX: FSMAX (0) vs BMRRX (100). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. BMRRX (-24.96). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. BMRRX (-35.93).
| BMRRX | FSMAX | BMRRX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.04 | 3,714% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.04 | 4,057% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.436 | 16.937 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 40.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.96 | 23.68 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.14 | 72.74 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.93 | 40.14 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.43 | 134.49 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement