Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMSVX vs FSMDX
BMSVX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts BMSVX vs FSMDX
BMSVX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMSVX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMSVX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. BMSVX (3.06B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than BMSVX: FSMDX (0.76) vs BMSVX (0.58). BMSVX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: BMSVX (10 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). BMSVX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). BMSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). BMSVX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.40 vs. BMSVX (17.11). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.60 vs. BMSVX (16.66).
| BMSVX | FSMDX | BMSVX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.03 | 2,360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.03 | 2,680% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.576 | 15.326 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 53.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.76 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.11 | 19.40 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.48 | 57.37 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.66 | 44.60 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 170.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers