BMVVF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.88M
ENCTF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.02 (+200.00%)
Updated
Mar 24 closing price
Capitalization
585.82K
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMVVF vs ENCTF

Header iconBMVVF vs ENCTF Comparison
Open Charts BMVVF vs ENCTFBanner chart's image
Bathurst Metals
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$500
Capitalization2.88M
Encanto Potash
Price$0.03
Change+$0.02 (+200.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization585.82K
BMVVF vs ENCTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ENCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMVVF vs. ENCTF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMVVF is a Buy and ENCTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BMVVF: $0.09 vs. ENCTF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: BMVVF and ENCTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMVVF: 5% vs. ENCTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BMVVF: $2.88M vs. ENCTF: $585.82K
BMVVF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.88M. ENCTF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $585.82K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMVVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileENCTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMVVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ENCTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMVVF is a better buy in the long-term than ENCTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMVVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ENCTF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMVVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ENCTF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ENCTF is a better buy in the short-term than BMVVF.

Price Growth

BMVVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.93% price change this week, while ENCTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMVVF($2.88M) has a higher market cap than ENCTF($586K). ENCTF YTD gains are higher at: 174.194 vs. BMVVF (97.477). ENCTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -211.29K vs. BMVVF (-322.66K). BMVVF has more cash in the bank: 198K vs. ENCTF (4.76K). BMVVF has less debt than ENCTF: BMVVF (50K) vs ENCTF (20M). BMVVF (0) and ENCTF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BMVVFENCTFBMVVF / ENCTF
Capitalization2.88M586K492%
EBITDA-322.66K-211.29K153%
Gain YTD97.477174.19456%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash198K4.76K4,164%
Total Debt50K20M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ENCTF: Fundamental Ratings
ENCTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMVVFENCTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ENCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATPC1.290.01
+0.78%
Agape ATP Corporation
ASPCU10.46N/A
N/A
A SPAC III Acquisition Corp
MGM34.48-0.07
-0.20%
MGM Resorts International
ADEA16.66-0.18
-1.07%
Adeia
ASLE8.33-0.10
-1.19%
AerSale Corp

BMVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMVVF and RCKTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMVVF and RCKTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMVVF
1D Price
Change %
BMVVF100%
N/A
RCKTF - BMVVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.86%
ENCTF - BMVVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - BMVVF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
IPX - BMVVF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
IONR - BMVVF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
More

ENCTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ENCTF and SLTFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENCTF and SLTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENCTF
1D Price
Change %
ENCTF100%
N/A
SLTFF - ENCTF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUBPF - ENCTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMVVF - ENCTF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALTPF - ENCTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
DRRSF - ENCTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More