BN
Price
$53.44
Change
+$0.52 (+0.98%)
Updated
Apr 25, 02:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
62.67B
13 days until earnings call
HLNE
Price
$150.45
Change
+$2.44 (+1.65%)
Updated
Apr 25, 02:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.5B
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BN vs HLNE

Header iconBN vs HLNE Comparison
Open Charts BN vs HLNEBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$53.44
Change+$0.52 (+0.98%)
Volume$700
Capitalization62.67B
Hamilton Lane
Price$150.45
Change+$2.44 (+1.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.5B
BN vs HLNE Comparison Chart
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. HLNE commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a StrongBuy and HLNE is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $52.92 vs. HLNE: $148.01)
Brand notoriety: BN and HLNE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 48% vs. HLNE: 74%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. HLNE: $4.5B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. HLNE’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLNE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the long-term than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLNE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLNE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.48% price change this week, while HLNE (@Investment Managers) price change was +7.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

HLNE is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than HLNE($4.5B). BN has higher P/E ratio than HLNE: BN (67.52) vs HLNE (34.22). HLNE YTD gains are higher at: 0.327 vs. BN (-7.714). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. HLNE (271M). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. HLNE (164M). HLNE has less debt than BN: HLNE (277M) vs BN (234B). BN has higher revenues than HLNE: BN (95.9B) vs HLNE (490M).
BNHLNEBN / HLNE
Capitalization62.7B4.5B1,393%
EBITDA30.7B271M11,328%
Gain YTD-7.7140.327-2,362%
P/E Ratio67.5234.22197%
Revenue95.9B490M19,571%
Total Cash16.9B164M10,305%
Total Debt234B277M84,477%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs HLNE: Fundamental Ratings
BN
HLNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1314
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2429
SMR RATING
1..100
8826
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
572
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLNE's Valuation (57) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (77). This means that HLNE’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (29). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's SMR Rating (26) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (88). This means that HLNE’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (58). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLNE (72). This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNHLNE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESML37.300.79
+2.16%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
MBCC32.530.51
+1.58%
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
EVN10.000.05
+0.50%
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
REAI19.050.08
+0.44%
Intelligent Real Estate ETF
XRMI17.690.02
+0.12%
Global X S&P 500® Risk Managed Inc ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+3.76%
BAM - BN
86%
Closely correlated
+3.64%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+5.94%
APO - BN
77%
Closely correlated
+5.35%
IVZ - BN
77%
Closely correlated
+4.15%
KKR - BN
76%
Closely correlated
+6.03%
More

HLNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLNE has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLNE jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNE
1D Price
Change %
HLNE100%
+2.71%
JHG - HLNE
77%
Closely correlated
+3.58%
BN - HLNE
76%
Closely correlated
+3.76%
STEP - HLNE
76%
Closely correlated
+4.16%
TPG - HLNE
75%
Closely correlated
+4.92%
BX - HLNE
75%
Closely correlated
+5.94%
More