BN
Price
$36.92
Change
+$0.38 (+1.04%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
81.03B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KKR
Price
$90.29
Change
-$0.95 (-1.04%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
83.7B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs KKR

BN vs KKR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Corporation (BN) vs. KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Business overlap: Both BN and KKR are global alternative asset managers, but they emphasize different engines—real assets, insurance, and operating businesses for Brookfield versus private equity, credit, and infrastructure for KKR.
  • Growth scale: Brookfield reported fee-bearing capital of roughly $614 billion and deployable capital near $210 billion, while KKR ended its latest quarter with about $758 billion in assets under management (AUM, the total value of assets a firm manages on behalf of clients).
  • Relative performance: KKR shares have traded sharply lower this year on reduced earnings visibility, whereas Brookfield's earnings growth has reaccelerated and its shares trade below management's own stated valuation.
  • Catalysts differ: Brookfield is riding AI (artificial intelligence) infrastructure, energy, and credit tailwinds; KKR is broadening into sports investing and infrastructure but faces near-term uncertainty on realized investment income.
  • Risk profiles: Brookfield's diversified, partly insurance-backed model is more structurally complex; KKR's model is more sensitive to monetization timing and private-credit sentiment.

Introduction

Investors evaluating large, diversified alternative asset managers frequently weigh Brookfield Corporation and KKR & Co. Inc. against one another, given their overlapping presence in private equity, credit, real assets, and insurance-linked capital. A stock comparison of BN and KKR is most relevant for those seeking exposure to the secular growth of private markets and fee-based earnings, while also understanding how differing business models translate into relative performance and risk. This article examines recent market positioning, momentum, and catalysts for both names to help traders and investors assess which profile better fits current market conditions.

BN Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Corporation is a global investment firm whose value is anchored in three segments: asset management, wealth (insurance) solutions, and a portfolio of operating businesses spanning infrastructure, renewable energy, real estate, and private equity. In recent quarters, the company's distributable earnings before realizations—a non-IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) measure management uses to assess recurring cash-generating capacity—reaccelerated, rising roughly 7% year over year in its latest reported period on stronger fee-related earnings.

Recent market activity has been shaped by several developments. The company completed the full combination with Oaktree, deepening its credit platform, and closed its acquisition of U.K.-based Just Group, lifting insurance assets to more than $190 billion. Management also highlighted a planned large-scale AI factory project in Kentucky and cited Westinghouse as a beneficiary of nuclear and energy-security demand. Brookfield reported fee-bearing capital near $614 billion and deployable capital of roughly $210 billion, positioning it to fund a broad AI and energy infrastructure pipeline. The stock has traded below management's own estimate of intrinsic value, which has supported share repurchases.

KKR Overview and Recent Performance

KKR & Co. Inc. is a leading alternative asset manager with a platform spanning private equity, real assets, credit and liquid strategies, and insurance. In its most recent quarter, KKR reported AUM of approximately $758 billion, up about 14% year over year, with fee-paying AUM rising about 17%. Fee-related earnings (FRE, the earnings generated from management and transaction fees regardless of investment performance) climbed roughly 24% year over year to about $1 billion.

Recent performance, however, has been marked by elevated volatility. After a first-quarter earnings beat, shares slid as management cautioned that market volatility had reduced visibility into 2026 adjusted net income (ANI, a non-GAAP measure reflecting total earnings power), making it more likely the firm lands below its earlier $7-per-share target. KKR nonetheless completed its acquisition of Arctos Partners, adding roughly $16 billion in AUM focused on professional sports franchise stakes, and later reported a record quarter with a landmark $16 billion Kuwait energy-infrastructure joint venture. Year to date, KKR shares have underperformed the broader market by a wide margin despite solid underlying fundraising.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a systematic, data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots selected for their suitability to current market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and statistical profile. Because not every bot is well suited to every market environment, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with present conditions earn a place in this section. Exploring the page can help investors identify automated strategies tailored to names like BN and KKR, among many others.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both firms are "alternative" asset managers, their business models create distinct trade-offs. Brookfield is an operator and owner at its core, generating value from real assets and cash-flowing businesses while layering a large, permanent insurance capital base on top. This gives it a steadier, more diversified earnings stream but also a more complex corporate structure that it has been actively simplifying. KKR is more fee-centric, deriving a larger share of growth from management fees, credit, and monetization activity, which can produce faster fee growth but greater sensitivity to transaction timing and market sentiment.

On recent momentum, the two have diverged. Brookfield's earnings growth has reaccelerated and it has leaned into AI infrastructure, energy security, and credit—areas with strong secular demand. KKR, by contrast, has delivered robust fee-related earnings growth but faced downward pressure on its share price because of reduced near-term visibility on realized performance income. Sector exposure also differs: Brookfield carries heavier weight in real estate, infrastructure, and insurance, while KKR skews toward private equity and a large credit and liquid strategies franchise. In terms of risk, Brookfield's complexity and leverage across affiliates are key watch items, whereas KKR's exposure to private-credit dislocation and monetization cycles represents its primary near-term vulnerability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors—trend consistency, earnings stability, diversification, and catalyst visibility—Tickeron's AI would likely favor Brookfield Corporation at present. Brookfield's reaccelerating distributable earnings, insurance-backed capital base, and clear AI and energy infrastructure pipeline suggest more durable, less transaction-dependent momentum, while its stock trades below management's own valuation. KKR offers strong fee-related earnings growth and a broader credit franchise, but its near-term outlook carries greater uncertainty around realized investment income and private-credit sentiment. Accordingly, the AI framework would assign a higher probability to Brookfield maintaining a steadier relative trajectory in the current environment, while acknowledging KKR's appeal to investors with a longer horizon for fee compounding.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BN vs. KKR commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a StrongBuy and KKR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs KKR: Fundamental Ratings
BN
KKR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1057
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6277
SMR RATING
1..100
8767
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9592
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BN's Valuation (77) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (81). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (77). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.

KKR's SMR Rating (67) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (87). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

KKR's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (73). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

KKR's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (95). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNKKR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BN: $36.92 vs. KKR: $90.29)
Brand notoriety: BN and KKR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 142% vs. KKR: 107%
Market capitalization -- BN: $81.03B vs. KKR: $83.7B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $81.03B. KKR’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $83.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $57 to $165.9B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while KKR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KKR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BN and KKR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • KKR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than KKR.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was -6.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

KKR is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KKR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMX115.680.49
+0.43%
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB DE CV
WXM3.76N/A
N/A
WF International Limited
VNT31.66-0.03
-0.09%
Vontier Corp
KBDC12.67-0.09
-0.71%
Kayne Anderson BDC Inc.
MRLN1.71-0.10
-5.52%
Merlin Inc

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.04%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
CG - BN
73%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
BX - BN
71%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
KKR - BN
70%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
ARES - BN
70%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
More

KKR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KKR
1D Price
Change %
KKR100%
-1.04%
BX - KKR
83%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
ARES - KKR
83%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
APO - KKR
82%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
TPG - KKR
78%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
CG - KKR
76%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
More