Brookfield Corporation (BN) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) are leading alternative asset managers navigating a dynamic market shaped by interest rate shifts, AI-driven infrastructure demand, and private credit expansion. This stock comparison evaluates their business models, recent performance, and relative positioning, offering insights for investors seeking exposure to fee-generating growth in asset management. Traders focused on momentum and volatility may appreciate contrasts in sector emphasis, while long-term holders will note differences in diversification and capital deployment. With both firms reporting strong fundraising amid broader sector pressures, understanding their trajectories aids informed portfolio decisions in today's environment.
Brookfield Corporation (BN) is a global investment firm with over $1 trillion in AUM across real estate, renewable power and transition, infrastructure, private equity, and wealth solutions including insurance. Its model blends asset management fees with income from operating businesses, providing resilience. Shares recently traded around $47, reflecting a market cap exceeding $100 billion.
In recent weeks, BN has gained approximately 10% from mid-March lows near $39, driven by record capital formation and fee-bearing capital growth to $614 billion. Q1 results highlighted $21 billion in fundraising year-to-date and last-twelve-month fee-related earnings up 18% to $3.1 billion. Sentiment has improved on strategic moves like UK pensions acquisitions and AI infrastructure plays, alongside endorsements from prominent investors. Broader performance shows 23% one-year returns, underscoring steady momentum amid market rotations toward real assets.
KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) is a global investment firm managing $758 billion in AUM as of Q1 2026, spanning private equity, real assets, credit (including liquid strategies), and insurance solutions. It emphasizes capital markets services and principal activities alongside fund management. Shares hovered near $102, with a market cap around $95 billion.
Recent market activity saw KKR advance about 17% over the past 30 days from $88 levels before a post-earnings pullback. Q1 2026 delivered adjusted EPS of $1.39 (beating estimates), segment revenues up 22% to $1.47 billion, and $28 billion in fundraising, lifting AUM 14% year-over-year. Management fees rose 30%, though volatility concerns tempered outlook. Year-to-date returns stand at 19%, supported by deals like the Arctos acquisition, but shares remain sensitive to private credit dynamics and monetization pace.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots earn their spot through superior performance in current conditions, with annualized returns reaching up to 285% (e.g., space sector plays), win rates of 70-80%, and profit factors up to 3.0+. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents like NVDA/AVGO/AMD (72% return, 60% win rate) and leveraged ETF strategies like GGLL (135% return, 69% win rate). Varying by style—momentum, swing, fundamental analysis—and timeframes from 5 minutes to weeks, they adapt to volatility in semis, industrials, AI infrastructure, and small caps. Traders can explore these high-conviction options to enhance strategies; visit the Trending AI Robots page for live stats and copy trading integration.
BN and KKR both capitalize on alternative assets, but BN’s broader operating footprint in renewables and infrastructure offers more stable net interest income (NII), while KKR leans on private equity and credit for higher growth potential via deal flow. Growth drivers diverge: BN targets insurance expansion and real asset compounding, versus KKR’s $23 billion North America fundraise and sports investments.
Recent momentum favors BN with superior 12-month gains (23% vs. KKR’s mixed YTD), though KKR shows sharper short-term rebounds. Risk factors include KKR’s exposure to redemption pressures in private credit and BN’s higher debt from operating leverage. Sector overlap exists in real assets, but BN emphasizes transition energy while KKR prioritizes credit ($329 billion AUM). Market sentiment tilts toward BN for resilience, per analyst upgrades.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BN due to its trend consistency, lower volatility, and relative stability from diversified real asset exposure amid market rotations. Observable catalysts like fee-bearing capital growth and insurance tailwinds position BN probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance versus KKR’s earnings sensitivity, though KKR retains upside from fundraising momentum.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKKR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.39% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.13%.
BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BN | KKR | BN / KKR | |
| Capitalization | 108B | 84B | 129% |
| EBITDA | 33.1B | 9.89B | 335% |
| Gain YTD | -3.514 | -23.700 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 86.53 | 32.96 | 263% |
| Revenue | 75.7B | 20.4B | 371% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 132B | - |
| Total Debt | 264B | 54.6B | 484% |
BN | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KKR's Valuation (80) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (87). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (68). This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (89). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (60). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (95). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
| BN | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 68% | 8 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.