BNKHF
Price
$3.15
Change
+$0.30 (+10.53%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
BYLB
Price
$84.70
Change
+$2.50 (+3.04%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BNKHF vs BYLB

Header iconBNKHF vs BYLB Comparison
Open Charts BNKHF vs BYLBBanner chart's image
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings)
Price$3.15
Change+$0.30 (+10.53%)
Volume$150
CapitalizationN/A
Boyle Ban
Price$84.70
Change+$2.50 (+3.04%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BNKHF vs BYLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNKHF vs. BYLB commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNKHF is a Buy and BYLB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BNKHF: $3.15 vs. BYLB: $84.70)
Brand notoriety: BNKHF and BYLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNKHF: 2% vs. BYLB: 14%
Market capitalization -- BNKHF: $32.14B vs. BYLB: $0
BNKHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $32.14B. BYLB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNKHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBYLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNKHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BYLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYLB is a better buy in the long-term than BNKHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNKHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BYLB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNKHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BYLB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BYLB is a better buy in the short-term than BNKHF.

Price Growth

BNKHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.97% price change this week, while BYLB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNKHF YTD gains are higher at: 22.093 vs. BYLB (6.927).
BNKHFBYLBBNKHF / BYLB
Capitalization32.1BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.0936.927319%
P/E Ratio8.75N/A-
Revenue66.4BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.94BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNKHF vs BYLB: Fundamental Ratings
BNKHF
BYLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9589
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
146
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5646
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYLB's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BNKHF (46). This means that BYLB’s stock grew similarly to BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

BYLB's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNKHF (100). This means that BYLB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYLB (46). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYLB’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BYLB (50). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to BYLB’s over the last 12 months.

BYLB's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BNKHF (56). This means that BYLB’s stock grew similarly to BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNKHFBYLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
17%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEDZ34.150.14
+0.42%
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
LQDH93.43-0.07
-0.08%
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corp Bd ETF
FTGC23.60-0.14
-0.57%
First Trust Global Tact Cmdty Strat ETF
GABF47.88-0.41
-0.85%
Gabelli Financial Services Opp ETF
DGRE25.74-0.28
-1.08%
WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Qual Div Gr ETF

BNKHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNKHF and JPPHY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNKHF and JPPHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNKHF
1D Price
Change %
BNKHF100%
N/A
JPPHY - BNKHF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGNN - BNKHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLB - BNKHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSF - BNKHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BYLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYLB and VBFC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYLB and VBFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYLB
1D Price
Change %
BYLB100%
N/A
VBFC - BYLB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - BYLB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IROQ - BYLB
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
EBSH - BYLB
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKUTK - BYLB
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
More