BNKHF
Price
$4.80
Change
+$0.41 (+9.34%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
49.78B
LSFG
Price
$48.50
Change
+$2.35 (+5.09%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
49.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNKHF vs LSFG

Header iconBNKHF vs LSFG Comparison
Open Charts BNKHF vs LSFGBanner chart's image
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings)
Price$4.80
Change+$0.41 (+9.34%)
Volume$334
Capitalization49.78B
Lifestore Financial Group
Price$48.50
Change+$2.35 (+5.09%)
Volume$100
Capitalization49.98M
BNKHF vs LSFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNKHF vs. LSFG commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNKHF is a Hold and LSFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BNKHF: $4.80 vs. LSFG: $48.50)
Brand notoriety: BNKHF and LSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNKHF: 8% vs. LSFG: 43%
Market capitalization -- BNKHF: $49.78B vs. LSFG: $49.98M
BNKHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $49.78B. LSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $49.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNKHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLSFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNKHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LSFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSFG is a better buy in the long-term than BNKHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNKHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNKHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LSFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BNKHF and LSFG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BNKHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.49% price change this week, while LSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNKHF($49.8B) has a higher market cap than LSFG($50M). BNKHF (10.37) and LSFG (9.96) have similar P/E ratio . BNKHF YTD gains are higher at: 52.381 vs. LSFG (9.605). LSFG has less debt than BNKHF: LSFG (49.8M) vs BNKHF (76.4B).
BNKHFLSFGBNKHF / LSFG
Capitalization49.8B50M99,600%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD52.3819.605545%
P/E Ratio10.379.96104%
Revenue72BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt76.4B49.8M153,414%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNKHF vs LSFG: Fundamental Ratings
BNKHF
LSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9947
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4517
SMR RATING
1..100
254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
47n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSFG's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNKHF (83). This means that LSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as BNKHF (45). This means that LSFG’s stock grew similarly to BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSFG (54). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (50). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (17). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNKHFLSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEDG34.304.09
+13.54%
SolarEdge Technologies
ENVB1.220.06
+5.01%
Enveric Biosciences Inc
TWFG29.411.16
+4.11%
TWFG Inc
GEG2.470.05
+2.07%
Great Elm Group
AFG134.611.55
+1.16%
American Financial Group

BNKHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNKHF and JPPHY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNKHF and JPPHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNKHF
1D Price
Change %
BNKHF100%
N/A
JPPHY - BNKHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+15.58%
LSFG - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGNN - BNKHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
BYLB - BNKHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSF - BNKHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSFG and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSFG and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSFG
1D Price
Change %
LSFG100%
N/A
MCHB - LSFG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHT - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - LSFG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - LSFG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More