BNPQF
Price
$89.00
Change
+$0.33 (+0.37%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
99.56B
SCGLF
Price
$59.95
Change
-$5.22 (-8.01%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
47.12B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNPQF vs SCGLF

Header iconBNPQF vs SCGLF Comparison
Open Charts BNPQF vs SCGLFBanner chart's image
BNP Paribas
Price$89.00
Change+$0.33 (+0.37%)
Volume$386
Capitalization99.56B
Societe Generale
Price$59.95
Change-$5.22 (-8.01%)
Volume$46
Capitalization47.12B
BNPQF vs SCGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNPQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNPQF vs. SCGLF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNPQF is a StrongBuy and SCGLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BNPQF: $89.00 vs. SCGLF: $61.03)
Brand notoriety: BNPQF and SCGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNPQF: 2% vs. SCGLF: 1%
Market capitalization -- BNPQF: $99.56B vs. SCGLF: $47.12B
BNPQF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $99.56B. SCGLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNPQF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNPQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCGLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCGLF is a better buy in the long-term than BNPQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNPQF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNPQF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCGLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNPQF is a better buy in the short-term than SCGLF.

Price Growth

BNPQF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.75% price change this week, while SCGLF (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNPQF($99.6B) has a higher market cap than SCGLF($47.1B). SCGLF has higher P/E ratio than BNPQF: SCGLF (8.78) vs BNPQF (8.11). SCGLF YTD gains are higher at: 117.302 vs. BNPQF (47.963). SCGLF has less debt than BNPQF: SCGLF (173B) vs BNPQF (402B). BNPQF has higher revenues than SCGLF: BNPQF (67B) vs SCGLF (54.2B).
BNPQFSCGLFBNPQF / SCGLF
Capitalization99.6B47.1B211%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD47.963117.30241%
P/E Ratio8.118.7892%
Revenue67B54.2B124%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt402B173B232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNPQF vs SCGLF: Fundamental Ratings
BNPQF
SCGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3099
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3721
SMR RATING
1..100
1005
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCGLF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (62). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (37). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BNPQF (100). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew significantly faster than BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (53). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNPQF (100). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNPQFSCGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNPQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XMTR49.892.44
+5.14%
Xometry
ABVE1.950.08
+4.28%
Above Food Ingredients Inc
TKO190.144.49
+2.42%
TKO Group Holdings
INDP6.39-0.01
-0.16%
Indaptus Therapeutics Inc
SEPN12.28-0.35
-2.73%
Septerna Inc

BNPQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNPQF has been loosely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNPQF jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNPQF
1D Price
Change %
BNPQF100%
+0.37%
BNPQY - BNPQF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
SCGLY - BNPQF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
CRARY - BNPQF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
KBCSY - BNPQF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
UNCRY - BNPQF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More

SCGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLF has been loosely correlated with KBCSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGLF jumps, then KBCSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGLF
1D Price
Change %
SCGLF100%
N/A
KBCSY - SCGLF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
PCLB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FVCB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
BNPQF - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.96%
BNPQY - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
More