It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNPQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOVCHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNPQY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OVCHY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BNPQY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while OVCHY (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.
BNPQY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
BNPQY | OVCHY | BNPQY / OVCHY | |
Capitalization | 78.9B | 45B | 175% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -2.411 | 33.932 | -7% |
P/E Ratio | 8.42 | 7.60 | 111% |
Revenue | 60.4B | 12.3B | 491% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 341B | N/A | - |
BNPQY | OVCHY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BNPQY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OVCHY (86). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew significantly faster than OVCHY’s over the last 12 months.
OVCHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQY (39). This means that OVCHY’s stock grew similarly to BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.
BNPQY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as OVCHY (5). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew similarly to OVCHY’s over the last 12 months.
OVCHY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQY (61). This means that OVCHY’s stock grew similarly to BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.
OVCHY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNPQY (90). This means that OVCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.
BNPQY | OVCHY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago49% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago68% | 3 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 5 days ago43% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago46% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNPQY has been loosely correlated with CRARY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNPQY jumps, then CRARY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BNPQY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BNPQY | 100% | +1.73% | ||
CRARY - BNPQY | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
ISNPY - BNPQY | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
SCGLY - BNPQY | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
NRDBY - BNPQY | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
UNCRY - BNPQY | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OVCHY has been loosely correlated with DBSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OVCHY jumps, then DBSDY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OVCHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OVCHY | 100% | +0.01% | ||
DBSDY - OVCHY | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
UOVEY - OVCHY | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
SUTNY - OVCHY | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
BNPQY - OVCHY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
CRARY - OVCHY | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.76% | ||
More |