BNPQY
Price
$44.96
Change
+$0.62 (+1.40%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
99.56B
60 days until earnings call
SCGLF
Price
$61.03
Change
+$1.09 (+1.82%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
47.12B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNPQY vs SCGLF

Header iconBNPQY vs SCGLF Comparison
Open Charts BNPQY vs SCGLFBanner chart's image
BNP Paribas
Price$44.96
Change+$0.62 (+1.40%)
Volume$355.81K
Capitalization99.56B
Societe Generale
Price$61.03
Change+$1.09 (+1.82%)
Volume$80
Capitalization47.12B
BNPQY vs SCGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNPQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNPQY vs. SCGLF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNPQY is a StrongBuy and SCGLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BNPQY: $44.96 vs. SCGLF: $61.03)
Brand notoriety: BNPQY and SCGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNPQY: 139% vs. SCGLF: 1%
Market capitalization -- BNPQY: $99.56B vs. SCGLF: $47.12B
BNPQY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $99.56B. SCGLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNPQY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNPQY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCGLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BNPQY and SCGLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNPQY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNPQY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCGLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCGLF is a better buy in the short-term than BNPQY.

Price Growth

BNPQY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.57% price change this week, while SCGLF (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNPQY is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNPQY($99.6B) has a higher market cap than SCGLF($47.1B). SCGLF has higher P/E ratio than BNPQY: SCGLF (8.78) vs BNPQY (8.19). SCGLF YTD gains are higher at: 121.235 vs. BNPQY (66.364). SCGLF has less debt than BNPQY: SCGLF (173B) vs BNPQY (402B). BNPQY has higher revenues than SCGLF: BNPQY (67B) vs SCGLF (54.2B).
BNPQYSCGLFBNPQY / SCGLF
Capitalization99.6B47.1B211%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD66.364121.23555%
P/E Ratio8.198.7893%
Revenue67B54.2B124%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt402B173B232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNPQY vs SCGLF: Fundamental Ratings
BNPQY
SCGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6999
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1320
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCGLF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQY (63). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLF (20). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew similarly to SCGLF’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLF (100). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew similarly to SCGLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQY (46). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQY (100). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNPQYSCGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNPQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCSM39.211.44
+3.81%
NCS Multistage Holdings
KWR145.360.57
+0.39%
Quaker Houghton
PKX52.81-0.71
-1.33%
POSCO Holdings
BIAF0.24N/A
-1.39%
bioAffinity Technologies
GILT9.56-0.26
-2.65%
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd

BNPQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNPQY has been loosely correlated with CRARY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNPQY jumps, then CRARY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNPQY
1D Price
Change %
BNPQY100%
+1.40%
CRARY - BNPQY
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
ISNPY - BNPQY
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
SCGLY - BNPQY
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
NRDBY - BNPQY
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
UNCRY - BNPQY
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More

SCGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLF has been loosely correlated with KBCSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGLF jumps, then KBCSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGLF
1D Price
Change %
SCGLF100%
+1.81%
KBCSY - SCGLF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
PCLB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FVCB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
BNPQF - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
BNPQY - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More