BNPQY
Price
$31.97
Change
-$0.05 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
78.9B
16 days until earnings call
SCGLF
Price
$29.78
Change
+$1.37 (+4.82%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
22.18B
Ad is loading...

BNPQY vs SCGLF

Header iconBNPQY vs SCGLF Comparison
Open Charts BNPQY vs SCGLFBanner chart's image
BNP Paribas
Price$31.97
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
Volume$221.82K
Capitalization78.9B
Societe Generale
Price$29.78
Change+$1.37 (+4.82%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization22.18B
BNPQY vs SCGLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNPQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNPQY vs. SCGLF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNPQY is a Hold and SCGLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BNPQY: $31.97 vs. SCGLF: $29.78)
Brand notoriety: BNPQY and SCGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNPQY: 57% vs. SCGLF: 108%
Market capitalization -- BNPQY: $78.9B vs. SCGLF: $22.18B
BNPQY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $78.9B. SCGLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNPQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNPQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCGLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNPQY is a better buy in the long-term than SCGLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNPQY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNPQY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCGLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCGLF is a better buy in the short-term than BNPQY.

Price Growth

BNPQY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.54% price change this week, while SCGLF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNPQY is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNPQY($78.9B) has a higher market cap than SCGLF($22.2B). SCGLF has higher P/E ratio than BNPQY: SCGLF (15.22) vs BNPQY (8.42). SCGLF YTD gains are higher at: 7.953 vs. BNPQY (4.134). SCGLF has less debt than BNPQY: SCGLF (154B) vs BNPQY (341B). BNPQY has higher revenues than SCGLF: BNPQY (60.4B) vs SCGLF (38.6B).
BNPQYSCGLFBNPQY / SCGLF
Capitalization78.9B22.2B355%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.1347.95352%
P/E Ratio8.4215.2255%
Revenue60.4B38.6B156%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt341B154B221%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNPQY vs SCGLF: Fundamental Ratings
BNPQY
SCGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44100
SMR RATING
1..100
35
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCGLF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQY (8). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCGLF (100). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCGLF’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLF (5). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew similarly to SCGLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQY (55). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQY (90). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNPQYSCGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNPQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OTCNX75.381.05
+1.41%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap R
JISCX23.220.12
+0.52%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value S
SVXFX55.910.11
+0.20%
Smead International Value I1
ASYMX15.470.03
+0.19%
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Y
SGHIX10.490.01
+0.10%
Sextant Global High Income

BNPQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNPQY has been loosely correlated with CRARY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNPQY jumps, then CRARY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNPQY
1D Price
Change %
BNPQY100%
-0.16%
CRARY - BNPQY
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
ISNPY - BNPQY
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
SCGLY - BNPQY
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
NRDBY - BNPQY
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
UNCRY - BNPQY
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More

SCGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLF has been loosely correlated with KBCSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGLF jumps, then KBCSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGLF
1D Price
Change %
SCGLF100%
N/A
KBCSY - SCGLF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
PCLB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FVCB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
BNPQF - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
BNPQY - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More