BNS
Price
$55.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
63.25B
59 days until earnings call
INGVF
Price
$21.53
Change
+$1.28 (+6.32%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
52.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNS vs INGVF

Header iconBNS vs INGVF Comparison
Open Charts BNS vs INGVFBanner chart's image
Bank of Nova Scotia
Price$55.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.58K
Capitalization63.25B
ING Groep
Price$21.53
Change+$1.28 (+6.32%)
Volume$1.51K
Capitalization52.71B
BNS vs INGVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNS vs. INGVF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNS is a StrongBuy and INGVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BNS: $54.84 vs. INGVF: $21.53)
Brand notoriety: BNS and INGVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNS: 208% vs. INGVF: 91%
Market capitalization -- BNS: $63.25B vs. INGVF: $52.71B
BNS [@Major Banks] is valued at $63.25B. INGVF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $52.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINGVF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INGVF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, INGVF is a better buy in the long-term than BNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BNS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BNS (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.24% price change this week, while INGVF (@Major Banks) price change was +6.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNS is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+3.39% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNS($63.2B) has a higher market cap than INGVF($52.7B). BNS has higher P/E ratio than INGVF: BNS (11.14) vs INGVF (9.91). INGVF YTD gains are higher at: 41.645 vs. BNS (2.085). INGVF has less debt than BNS: INGVF (125B) vs BNS (306B). BNS has higher revenues than INGVF: BNS (32.2B) vs INGVF (19.6B).
BNSINGVFBNS / INGVF
Capitalization63.2B52.7B120%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.08541.6455%
P/E Ratio11.149.91112%
Revenue32.2B19.6B164%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt306B125B245%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNS vs INGVF: Fundamental Ratings
BNS
INGVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6797
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7021
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1625
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INGVF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as BNS (76) in the Major Banks industry. This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNS (70) in the Major Banks industry. This means that INGVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNS’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BNS (3) in the Major Banks industry. This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to BNS’s over the last 12 months.

BNS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as INGVF (48) in the null industry. This means that BNS’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

BNS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as INGVF (25) in the null industry. This means that BNS’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVX1.03N/A
+0.49%
NOVONIX Limited
TCBK41.120.06
+0.15%
TriCo Bancshares
AEP102.460.11
+0.11%
American Electric Power Company
CLSK10.66-0.15
-1.39%
CleanSpark
OKUR2.39-0.12
-4.96%
OnKure Therapeutics Inc

BNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNS has been closely correlated with BMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BNS jumps, then BMO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNS
1D Price
Change %
BNS100%
-0.47%
BMO - BNS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
CM - BNS
76%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
RY - BNS
74%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
TD - BNS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
EWBC - BNS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More

INGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INGVF and RY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INGVF and RY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGVF
1D Price
Change %
INGVF100%
+6.34%
RY - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
ANZGF - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
ING - INGVF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.19%
BNS - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
BMO - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
More