Advertisement
BNT vs FDT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a StrongBuy and FDT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BNT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BNT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.11% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.39% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| BNT | FDT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 86% |
Advertisement
BNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with RGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then RGA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNT | 100% | -4.00% | ||
| RGA - BNT | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| L - BNT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| MKL - BNT | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.93% | ||
| CINF - BNT | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| KMPR - BNT | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.54% | ||
More | ||||
FDT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDT has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDT jumps, then STM could also see price increases.