BNT
Price
$45.86
Change
-$0.32 (-0.69%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
12.51B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MKL
Price
$1834.58
Change
-$4.19 (-0.23%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.94B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs MKL

Header iconBNT vs MKL Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs MKLBanner chart's image
BNT vs MKL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. (BNT) vs. Markel Group Inc. (MKL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both BNT and MKL operate in the insurance sector, with BNT focusing on retirement services, annuities, and reinsurance, while MKL emphasizes specialty property and casualty insurance alongside diversified ventures.
  • BNT trades at a trailing P/E of 13.5 with a market cap of $12.3B, showing YTD gains of 3.21% and 1-year returns of 22.3%, supported by strong cash reserves exceeding $13B.
  • MKL, with a larger $22B market cap and trailing P/E of 12.9, has faced recent headwinds including a Q1 2026 operating loss and YTD underperformance amid earnings misses.
  • BNT offers a dividend yield of 0.62%, contrasting with MKL's zero yield, appealing to income-focused investors.
  • Recent market activity highlights BNT's stability post-rebranding and acquisitions, versus MKL's pressures from activist calls and premium declines.
  • Lower beta of 0.67 for MKL indicates less volatility compared to BNT's 1.67, suiting different risk profiles in the current environment.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines BNT and MKL, two insurance-focused companies navigating evolving market dynamics. Investors seeking exposure to diversified insurance operations, reinsurance growth, or specialty lines may find value in analyzing their relative performance. With both firms reporting robust revenue bases—BNT at $11.64B and MKL at $16.01B—this analysis highlights key metrics on valuation, momentum, and sector positioning. Traders monitoring insurance sector trends, such as premium growth and investment returns, will benefit from understanding their contrasts in stability, growth drivers, and recent sentiment shifts.

BNT Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. (BNT), formerly Brookfield Reinsurance Ltd., delivers retirement services, wealth protection products, and capital solutions via annuities, property and casualty (P&C), and life insurance segments. Headquartered in Bermuda with about 4,000 employees, it reported $11.64B in revenue and $766M net income, yielding a 6.58% profit margin and 5.57% ROE (return on equity).

In recent market activity, BNT has shown resilience, with shares around $45, a 52-week range of $35.95–$49.86, and positive 1-year returns of 22.3%. A trailing P/E of 13.5 and price-to-book of 0.70 reflect attractive valuation amid $13.49B cash reserves offsetting $8.85B debt. Sentiment has been buoyed by strategic moves like the Just Group acquisition and $20B capital backing for insurers, alongside a rebrand emphasizing wealth solutions. These factors have supported steady performance despite broader sector volatility, with a beta of 1.67 signaling moderate sensitivity to market swings.

MKL Overview and Recent Performance

Markel Group Inc. (MKL) specializes in specialty insurance, including general liability, workers' compensation, and marine coverage, complemented by Markel Ventures in industrial, financial, and consumer areas. Operating globally from Virginia, it generated $16.01B revenue and $1.75B net income, with an 11.07% profit margin but recent negative operating margin of -9.68%.

Recent weeks have pressured MKL, trading near $1,751 within a 52-week range of $1,719–$2,208. Q1 2026 results showed $3.55B operating revenues missing estimates, swinging to a $273M operating loss with premiums down year-over-year, contributing to YTD softness despite stronger historical gains. Valuation metrics include a trailing P/E of 12.9 and price-to-book of 1.23, backed by $5.71B cash against $4.38B debt. Activist pressure from JANA Partners for Ventures divestiture and buybacks has influenced sentiment, with a low beta of 0.67 underscoring relative stability amid execution challenges.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots excel in current market conditions, delivering impressive stats like annualized returns from +23% to +162%, win rates of 51%–88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Strategies vary by timeframe (e.g., 5min to 60min), style (signal, virtual, brokerage agents), and sectors like semiconductors or small caps—such as a semiconductor bot with +96% returns and 63% win rate. Ideal for traders seeking automated, data-driven signals with risk management, this section highlights bots with proven edge. Explore Trending AI Robots to align with your portfolio.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BNT and MKL share insurance cores but diverge in models: BNT leverages reinsurance and annuities for capital-efficient growth, evident in its 8.42% operating margin and acquisitions driving scale, while MKL blends specialty P&C with Ventures for diversified income streams, though recent losses highlight integration risks.

Growth drivers contrast: BNT's pension risk transfer and $20B capital deployments fuel momentum, versus MKL's international premium ambitions amid activist scrutiny. Recent momentum favors BNT's 22% 1-year gains over MKL's pressures. Risk factors include BNT's higher beta and debt load versus MKL's Ventures opacity. Both expose to insurance cycles, but BNT leans retirement demographics, MKL niche risks. Sentiment tilts toward BNT's stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors BNT over MKL, citing superior recent momentum, dividend support, and catalysts like capital deployments amid MKL's earnings shortfalls and operating losses. BNT's trend consistency and relative valuation position it probabilistically stronger in the near term, though MKL's lower volatility offers defensiveness if execution improves.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
BNT vs. MKL commentary
May 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Hold and MKL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (BNT: $45.86 vs. MKL: $1833.22)
Brand notoriety: BNT and MKL are both not notable
BNT represents the Multi-Line Insurance, while MKL is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 16% vs. MKL: 117%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $12.51B vs. MKL: $22.94B
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $12.51B. MKL’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $22.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $124.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $34.06B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMKL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MKL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNT is a better buy in the long-term than MKL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MKL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BNT and MKL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +0.02% price change this week, while MKL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.95%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

MKL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.01% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.08% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKL($22.9B) has a higher market cap than BNT($12.5B). BNT (13.69) and MKL (13.26) have similar P/E ratio . BNT YTD gains are higher at: -0.029 vs. MKL (-14.720). MKL has less debt than BNT: MKL (4.38B) vs BNT (4.77B). MKL has higher revenues than BNT: MKL (15.9B) vs BNT (14.6B).
BNTMKLBNT / MKL
Capitalization12.5B22.9B55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.029-14.7200%
P/E Ratio13.6913.26103%
Revenue14.6B15.9B92%
Total CashN/A10.9B-
Total Debt4.77B4.38B109%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MKL: Fundamental Ratings
MKL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTMKL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MKL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IALT28.270.09
+0.31%
iShares Systematic Alternatives Actv ETF
FEX131.66-0.39
-0.30%
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® ETF
UYM31.55-0.10
-0.31%
ProShares Ultra Materials
MNRS43.43-0.24
-0.56%
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
ISCB71.00-0.49
-0.68%
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF

MKL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKL has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MKL jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKL
1D Price
Change %
MKL100%
-0.30%
HIG - MKL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
THG - MKL
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
CINF - MKL
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
TRV - MKL
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
L - MKL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More