BOF
Price
$2.36
Change
+$0.02 (+0.85%)
Updated
Sep 15, 04:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.81M
LFVN
Price
$10.68
Change
-$0.45 (-4.04%)
Updated
Sep 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
135.54M
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOF vs LFVN

Header iconBOF vs LFVN Comparison
Open Charts BOF vs LFVNBanner chart's image
BranchOut Food
Price$2.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.85%)
Volume$984
Capitalization27.81M
Lifevantage
Price$10.68
Change-$0.45 (-4.04%)
Volume$8.73K
Capitalization135.54M
BOF vs LFVN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOF vs. LFVN commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOF is a Buy and LFVN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BOF: $2.36 vs. LFVN: $10.68)
Brand notoriety: BOF and LFVN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOF: 9% vs. LFVN: 152%
Market capitalization -- BOF: $27.81M vs. LFVN: $135.54M
BOF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $27.81M. LFVN’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $135.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $231.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLFVN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LFVN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFVN is a better buy in the long-term than BOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFVN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LFVN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BOF and LFVN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BOF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +5.12% price change this week, while LFVN (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -6.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +262.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFVN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.31% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFVN($136M) has a higher market cap than BOF($27.8M). BOF YTD gains are higher at: 35.260 vs. LFVN (-35.896). LFVN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.4M vs. BOF (-3.66M). BOF has less debt than LFVN: BOF (7.27M) vs LFVN (12.4M). LFVN has higher revenues than BOF: LFVN (229M) vs BOF (10.2M).
BOFLFVNBOF / LFVN
Capitalization27.8M136M20%
EBITDA-3.66M15.4M-24%
Gain YTD35.260-35.896-98%
P/E RatioN/A14.24-
Revenue10.2M229M4%
Total Cash641KN/A-
Total Debt7.27M12.4M59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFVN: Fundamental Ratings
LFVN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOFLFVN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GELEF0.170.02
+14.44%
GRAPHANO ENERGY LTD
BNDSY7.72N/A
N/A
Banco De Sabadell SA
ROYUF73.11N/A
N/A
Royal Unibrew A S
TTNMF1.04N/A
N/A
Titanium Transportation Group
VIRDY72.00N/A
N/A
Viridien

BOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOF has been loosely correlated with BRID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOF jumps, then BRID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOF
1D Price
Change %
BOF100%
-1.68%
BRID - BOF
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.89%
DAR - BOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
NSRGF - BOF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
COOT - BOF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
NSRGY - BOF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
More

LFVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LFVN and INGR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFVN and INGR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFVN
1D Price
Change %
LFVN100%
-5.03%
INGR - LFVN
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
FRPT - LFVN
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
MZTI - LFVN
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
DAR - LFVN
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
NCRA - LFVN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More