BOF vs MUSLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOF is a Sell and MUSLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMUSLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MUSLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BOF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BOF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +8.33% price change this week, while MUSLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -10.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| BOF | MUSLF | BOF / MUSLF | |
| Capitalization | 7.77M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | -2.47M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 61.157 | -73.587 | -83% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.37M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.01M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 376K | N/A | - |
| BOF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TEDIX | 31.47 | 0.05 | +0.16% |
| Franklin Mutual Global Discovery A | |||
| IRVAX | 32.34 | -0.10 | -0.31% |
| Voya Russell Large Cap Value Idx Port A | |||
| INIVX | 11.33 | -0.06 | -0.53% |
| VanEck International Investors Gold A | |||
| ARAOX | 15.34 | -0.13 | -0.84% |
| Aristotle/Saul Global Eq A | |||
| WSMNX | 28.86 | -0.47 | -1.60% |
| William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth N | |||
BOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BOF and BRID have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOF and BRID's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOF | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| BRID - BOF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| NSRGF - BOF | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| NSRGY - BOF | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| NGRBF - BOF | 10% Poorly correlated | +5.26% | ||
| LFVN - BOF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||
MUSLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MUSLF and NGRBF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MUSLF and NGRBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MUSLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUSLF | 100% | +5.74% | ||
| NGRBF - MUSLF | 8% Poorly correlated | +5.26% | ||
| BOF - MUSLF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| BRLS - MUSLF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KLG - MUSLF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| NBND - MUSLF | -7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||