BOH
Price
$63.70
Change
-$0.08 (-0.13%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Capitalization
2.53B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$17.27
Change
-$0.13 (-0.75%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.12B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOH vs FULT

Header iconBOH vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts BOH vs FULTBanner chart's image
Bank of Hawaii
Price$63.70
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
Volume$240.67K
Capitalization2.53B
Fulton Financial
Price$17.27
Change-$0.13 (-0.75%)
Volume$1.28M
Capitalization3.12B
BOH vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
BOH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOH vs. FULT commentary
Nov 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOH is a Hold and FULT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BOH: $63.70 vs. FULT: $17.27)
Brand notoriety: BOH and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOH: 57% vs. FULT: 80%
Market capitalization -- BOH: $2.53B vs. FULT: $3.12B
BOH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.53B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BOH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than BOH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BOH is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

BOH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.47% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

BOH is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.90% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.12B) has a higher market cap than BOH($2.53B). BOH has higher P/E ratio than FULT: BOH (15.59) vs FULT (9.04). FULT (-7.722) and BOH (-7.811) have similar YTD gains . FULT has more cash in the bank: 362M vs. BOH (272M). BOH has less debt than FULT: BOH (650M) vs FULT (1.77B). FULT has higher revenues than BOH: FULT (1.29B) vs BOH (683M).
BOHFULTBOH / FULT
Capitalization2.53B3.12B81%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.811-7.722101%
P/E Ratio15.599.04172%
Revenue683M1.29B53%
Total Cash272M362M75%
Total Debt650M1.77B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOH vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
BOH
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
105
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7843
SMR RATING
1..100
1612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOH (75). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOH (78). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BOH (16). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BOH’s over the last 12 months.

BOH's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (59). This means that BOH’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BOH (82). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BOH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOHFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBMCX23.46N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr C
MSSYX9.67N/A
N/A
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Z
JIJIX15.46N/A
N/A
JHancock International Dynamic Gr I
UUOAX21.37N/A
N/A
GMO U.S. Opportunistic Value Vi
RGLGX27.39-0.30
-1.08%
American Funds Global Insight R-6

BOH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOH has been closely correlated with FHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BOH jumps, then FHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOH
1D Price
Change %
BOH100%
-0.13%
FHB - BOH
86%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
UBSI - BOH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
UCB - BOH
85%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
STBA - BOH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
TRMK - BOH
84%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
More