Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BOPAX vs FWMMX
BOPAX vs FWMMX Comparison
Open Charts BOPAX vs FWMMX
BOPAX vs FWMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. BOPAX (351M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than BOPAX: FWMMX (1.37) vs BOPAX (0.00). BOPAX was incepted earlier than FWMMX: BOPAX (23 years) vs FWMMX (6 years). BOPAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). BOPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.82 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BOPAX: FWMMX (250) vs BOPAX (1000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.06 vs. BOPAX (2.30). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. BOPAX (-23.95).
| BOPAX | FWMMX | BOPAX / FWMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.35 | 317% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.35 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.417 | 6.639 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 351M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 13.06 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.68 | 34.56 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.95 | 35.40 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement