Investors navigating thematic ETFs in the innovation space often compare BOTZ and CTEC, both from Global X ETFs. BOTZ provides targeted exposure to robotics and artificial intelligence, core drivers of technological disruption. CTEC, meanwhile, focuses on climate technologies essential for sustainable energy solutions. While not direct competitors, they represent alternative strategies for growth-oriented portfolios seeking sector-specific exposure beyond broad technology indices. With AI adoption accelerating and climate initiatives gaining traction amid geopolitical energy shifts, this comparison highlights structural differences, cost profiles, and positioning to aid informed allocation decisions.
The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a passive ETF tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It invests in companies benefiting from robotics and AI adoption, spanning industrial automation, non-industrial robots, and autonomous vehicles. The fund holds 62 stocks with top positions including ABB Ltd (8.79%), NVDA (8.50%), Keyence Corp (7.90%), Fanuc Corp (7.68%), and ISRG (7.30%). Sector allocations emphasize industrials (44.7%), information technology (33.2%), and health care (10.8%). BOTZ's expense ratio is 0.68%, with $3.36 billion in AUM ensuring high liquidity (30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.03%). Its unconstrained global approach provides diversified thematic exposure without leverage.
The Global X ClimateTech ETF (CTEC) passively tracks the Indxx Global ClimateTech Index, targeting companies advancing technologies to mitigate climate change impacts, such as renewables, energy storage, and efficiency solutions. It comprises 40 holdings, with leading weights in Bloom Energy (BE, 7.6%), Vestas Wind Systems (7.2%), Samsung SDI (6.6%), Contemporary Amperex Technology (6.0%), and First Solar (FSLR, around 6%). Sectors are dominated by industrials (60%) and technology (30%). CTEC's expense ratio stands at 0.50%, lower than peers, though its smaller AUM of about $28 million results in wider spreads (0.54%). The fund emphasizes market-cap weighting for global climate tech exposure.
The robotics/AI and climate tech sectors operate amid robust tailwinds. AI and robotics markets are expanding rapidly, fueled by automation demands in manufacturing, healthcare, and logistics, with global robotics projected to grow substantially through the decade. Climate tech benefits from regulatory pushes for net-zero emissions, subsidies like the Inflation Reduction Act, and surging energy needs from data centers powering AI. Capital flows into both themes reflect investor appetite for innovation, though climate tech faces policy risks and commodity volatility. Macro drivers include interest rate trajectories affecting growth stocks and geopolitical tensions influencing supply chains for semiconductors and rare earths critical to both ETFs.
In recent market cycles, CTEC has demonstrated stronger relative performance compared to BOTZ, buoyed by momentum in clean energy amid electrification trends and AI-driven power demands. BOTZ, while volatile due to heavy technology weighting, maintains steadier positioning tied to AI infrastructure leaders like NVIDIA. CTEC's concentration amplifies swings from renewable policy shifts, whereas BOTZ's broader holdings mitigate single-theme risks. Volatility profiles differ, with BOTZ benefiting from larger scale and diversified robotics exposure across cycles. Sector rotation toward energy efficiency has favored CTEC lately, but AI secular growth supports BOTZ's long-term edge.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-generated signals. Customizable filters include industry focus, market capitalization, technical indicators like RSI or moving averages, price patterns, and performance metrics such as relative strength. This efficiency surpasses manual screening, uncovering trade ideas, breakout candidates, and opportunities in sectors like AI or climate tech. Explore it to streamline your research and identify high-potential ETFs like BOTZ or CTEC.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BOTZ over CTEC. BOTZ's superior diversification (62 holdings), massive AUM for liquidity, and alignment with the durable AI megatrend outweigh CTEC's cost advantage and recent outperformance. While CTEC benefits from climate momentum, BOTZ exhibits stronger structural positioning, trend consistency in robotics/AI, and lower risk via scale—positioning it for probable outperformance over multi-year horizons in a tech-driven market.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| BOTZ | CTEC | BOTZ / CTEC | |
| Gain YTD | -0.607 | 15.398 | -4% |
| Net Assets | 3.49B | 27.2M | 12,846% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.50 | 136% |
| Turnover | 12.11 | 34.80 | 35% |
| Yield | 0.47 | 0.55 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| BOTZ | CTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOTZ has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOTZ jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| NVDA - BOTZ | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SERV - BOTZ | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WRD - BOTZ | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HSAI - BOTZ | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SOUN - BOTZ | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that CTEC and NVX have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTEC and NVX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTEC | 100% | N/A | ||
| NVX - CTEC | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SEDG - CTEC | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BLDP - CTEC | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BE - CTEC | 13% Poorly correlated | -6.43% | ||
| LAND - CTEC | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||