BOTZ
Price
$36.65
Change
-$1.68 (-4.38%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.54B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DRIV
Price
$38.24
Change
-$2.02 (-5.02%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
459.71M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTZ vs DRIV

BOTZ vs DRIV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) vs. Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV)

Key Takeaways

  • BOTZ targets robotics and AI across industrials (44.8%) and information technology (34.5%), with 62 holdings and top-10 concentration at ~58%, offering focused exposure to automation leaders.
  • DRIV provides broader diversification with 76 holdings, emphasizing autonomous vehicles and EVs through information technology (38.9%) and consumer discretionary (25.0%), with lower top-10 concentration (~26%).
  • Both passive thematic ETFs from Global X share a 0.68% expense ratio, but BOTZ exhibits superior liquidity (0.03% 30-day median bid-ask spread vs. DRIV's 0.40%) and larger AUM ($3.79B vs. $434M).
  • BOTZ's annual rebalancing contrasts with DRIV's semi-annual adjustments, influencing responsiveness to thematic shifts in AI/robotics versus EV/autonomous tech.
  • Overlap in holdings like NVDA (8.37% BOTZ, 2.85% DRIV) highlights shared AI enablers, but BOTZ leans industrial robotics while DRIV captures EV supply chain breadth.
  • BOTZ suits investors favoring concentrated AI/robotics momentum; DRIV appeals for diversified exposure to electrification and autonomy amid policy-driven capital flows.

Introduction

Amid accelerating adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and electrification, the Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) offer targeted thematic exposure to transformative technologies. While both draw from overlapping AI enablers, BOTZ emphasizes robotics and automation across industries, whereas DRIV focuses on electric vehicles (EVs), autonomous driving tech, and related materials. These ETFs represent complementary strategies for investors seeking growth in innovation-driven sectors, particularly as sector rotation favors tech and industrials. Comparing their structures reveals key differences in diversification, concentration, and positioning within the burgeoning mobility and automation landscapes.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) Overview

The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a passively managed thematic ETF that seeks to track the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. This index targets companies in developed markets deriving significant revenue from robotics, AI software, industrial automation, non-industrial robots, and autonomous vehicles. BOTZ holds 62 stocks, with the top 10 comprising approximately 58% of assets, including Keyence Corp (9.42%), ABB Ltd (8.83%), Fanuc Corp (8.49%), NVDA (8.37%), and Intuitive Surgical Inc (5.91%). Sector allocations tilt toward industrials (44.8%), information technology (34.5%), and health care (9.6%). The expense ratio is 0.68%, with annual reconstitution and rebalancing typically in March, semi-annual reviews for IPOs and corporate actions, and caps (e.g., 8% single stock max) to manage concentration. AUM stands at $3.79 billion, bolstered by a tight 0.03% 30-day median bid-ask spread, signaling strong liquidity.

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) Overview

The Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) passively tracks the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, focusing on firms involved in EV production, components, materials, autonomous tech, and related services. With 76 holdings, it features lower concentration, top 10 at ~26%: Intel Corp (5.71%), Alphabet Inc Class A (2.93%), NVDA (2.85%), Qualcomm Inc (2.67%), and TSLA (2.35%). Sectors include information technology (38.9%), consumer discretionary (25.0%), industrials (17.5%), and materials (14.7%). The 0.68% expense ratio aligns with BOTZ; rebalancing occurs semi-annually (January and July), with 3% single-stock caps and segment-based adjustments. AUM is $434 million, with a 0.40% 30-day median bid-ask spread indicating moderate liquidity. This structure provides balanced access to the EV and autonomy value chain.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The robotics/AI and autonomous/EV sectors thrive amid surging demand for automation, driven by labor shortages, AI advancements, and decarbonization mandates. Catalysts include data center expansions powering AI models, regulatory pushes for EV adoption (e.g., emissions standards), and breakthroughs in humanoid robotics and self-driving tech. Capital flows favor these themes, with thematic ETFs seeing sustained inflows amid macro shifts like interest rate stabilization and infrastructure spending. Risks encompass supply chain disruptions for semiconductors/batteries, geopolitical tensions affecting rare earth materials, and valuation stretches in high-growth names. Broader cycles highlight sector resilience, tied to innovation rather than cyclical downturns.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, BOTZ has demonstrated resilience linked to AI momentum and industrial rotation, buoyed by top holdings like NVDA amid semiconductor demand. DRIV has shown strength during EV policy tailwinds and autonomy pilots, though more volatile due to auto sector earnings sensitivity. BOTZ's higher concentration amplifies upside from robotics leaders but elevates beta (1.54 vs. S&P 500), while DRIV's diversification tempers swings (beta 1.58). Relative positioning favors BOTZ in AI hype phases and DRIV amid electrification subsidies, with both navigating macro shifts like rate expectations and commodity trends in lithium/semiconductors.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (total value of outstanding shares), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like thematic ETFs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors BOTZ due to its superior liquidity, larger scale, concentrated exposure to high-momentum AI/robotics leaders, and structural alignment with enduring automation trends. While DRIV offers broader diversification, BOTZ's tighter spreads, annual rebalancing responsiveness, and industrials tilt position it probabilistically stronger amid AI capital flows and sector momentum, assuming moderate volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BOTZ vs. DRIV commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTZ is a Hold and DRIV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOTZ has more net assets: 3.54B vs. DRIV (460M). DRIV has a higher annual dividend yield than BOTZ: DRIV (36.091) vs BOTZ (5.796). BOTZ was incepted earlier than DRIV: BOTZ (10 years) vs DRIV (8 years). BOTZ (0.68) and DRIV (0.68) have comparable expense ratios . DRIV has a higher turnover BOTZ (12.11) vs BOTZ (12.11).
BOTZDRIVBOTZ / DRIV
Gain YTD5.79636.09116%
Net Assets3.54B460M768%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.68100%
Turnover12.1137.4632%
Yield0.590.7678%
Fund Existence10 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTZDRIV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DRIV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UYLD51.120.01
+0.01%
Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF
LRNZ60.65-0.45
-0.74%
TrueShares Tech, AI and Deep Lrng ETF
PBDC26.33-0.27
-1.02%
Putnam BDC Income ETF
PRXG38.71-0.51
-1.29%
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF
GMEU7.71-0.22
-2.77%
T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF

BOTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOTZ has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOTZ jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOTZ
1D Price
Change %
BOTZ100%
-0.10%
NVDA - BOTZ
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
SERV - BOTZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
WRD - BOTZ
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.96%
HSAI - BOTZ
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
SOUN - BOTZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.37%
More

DRIV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DRIV has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DRIV jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRIV
1D Price
Change %
DRIV100%
+0.36%
STM - DRIV
85%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
CEVA - DRIV
71%
Closely correlated
-2.63%
DAN - DRIV
69%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
ALGM - DRIV
69%
Closely correlated
+4.37%
ENS - DRIV
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
More