BOTZ
Price
$40.27
Change
-$0.36 (-0.89%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBD
Price
$22.25
Change
-$0.21 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
233.54M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTZ vs PBD

Header iconBOTZ vs PBD Comparison
Open Charts BOTZ vs PBDBanner chart's image
BOTZ vs PBD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) vs. Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD)

Key Takeaways

  • BOTZ offers concentrated exposure to robotics and AI leaders like NVDA and Keyence, with top 10 holdings comprising over 58% of assets, while PBD provides broader diversification across 111 clean energy firms using tiered equal-weighting.
  • Both ETFs emphasize industrials (BOTZ: 44.8%, PBD: 48.7%) but differ in secondary exposures: BOTZ leans into information technology (34.5%) and health care, versus PBD's utilities (18.5%) focus.
  • BOTZ features a lower expense ratio of 0.68% and superior liquidity (0.03% median bid-ask spread) compared to PBD's 0.75% and 0.30% spread.
  • BOTZ demonstrates stronger trend consistency amid AI momentum, while PBD exhibits higher volatility tied to interest rate sensitivity and policy shifts.
  • PBD's quarterly rebalancing supports ongoing exposure to innovation in renewables, contrasting BOTZ's market-cap weighted thematic approach.
  • Larger scale for BOTZ ($3.79B AUM) enhances structural stability over PBD ($220M AUM).

Introduction

Comparing the BOTZ and PBD ETFs highlights alternative pathways to thematic investing in transformative technologies. While neither competes directly, both target growth-oriented sectors—robotics/AI for BOTZ and clean energy innovation for PBD—appealing to investors seeking exposure beyond broad market indices. In today's environment of rapid technological advancement and energy transition pressures, these passive thematic funds offer distinct sector exposure profiles. BOTZ capitalizes on AI-driven automation, while PBD addresses renewable energy and efficiency. This ETF comparison evaluates their structural differences, helping investors assess fit within diversified portfolios amid evolving macro dynamics like interest rates and innovation cycles.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) Overview

The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a passive thematic ETF issued by Global X Management Company LLC, launched in September 2016. It tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, investing at least 80% of assets in companies involved in robotics development, industrial automation, non-industrial robots, and autonomous vehicles. With 62 holdings and $3.79 billion in assets under management (AUM), BOTZ employs a market-cap weighted approach for global exposure across developed markets.

Top holdings include Keyence Corp (9.42%), ABB Ltd (8.83%), Fanuc Corp (8.49%), NVIDIA Corp (8.37%), and Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG, 5.91%), with the top 10 accounting for about 58% of the portfolio. Sector allocations feature industrials at 44.8%, information technology at 34.5%, and health care at 9.6%. The expense ratio is 0.68%, with a tight 30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.03% indicating strong liquidity. This structure positions BOTZ for growth in AI and automation trends.

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) Overview

The Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is a passive thematic ETF from Invesco, inception June 2007. It tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index, focusing on companies advancing cleaner energy generation, conservation, efficiency, and renewables. Holding 111 securities and $220 million AUM, PBD invests at least 90% in index components, including ADRs and GDRs, with tiered equal-weighting for balanced exposure.

Top holdings, each under 2.2%, include ITM Power PLC (2.18%), Ceres Power Holdings PLC (1.89%), LS Electric Co Ltd (1.80%), Doosan Fuel Cell Co Ltd (1.72%), and LS Corp (1.64%), promoting diversification. Sectors break down to industrials (48.68%), utilities (18.45%), information technology (15.89%), and consumer discretionary (9.78%). The expense ratio stands at 0.75%, with quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution; liquidity shows a 0.30% median bid-ask spread and average daily volume around 68,000 shares. PBD suits investors eyeing global clean tech evolution.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Robotics and AI sectors powering BOTZ benefit from surging demand for automation, driven by AI model advancements into reasoning, physical applications like humanoid robots, and data center expansions. Catalysts include enterprise AI adoption, computing power needs, and geopolitical pushes for tech sovereignty, with capital flows favoring leaders in semiconductors and machinery. Risks encompass high valuations, energy constraints, and regulatory scrutiny on AI ethics.

Clean energy themes in PBD ride renewable transitions amid climate policies and AI-induced power demands, spurring solar, hydrogen, and efficiency tech. Macro drivers like potential rate cuts and infrastructure spending bolster utilities and renewables, though sector risks include policy volatility, supply chain issues, and interest rate sensitivity for capital-heavy projects. Both themes intersect via AI's energy hunger, potentially amplifying cross-exposure in recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, BOTZ has shown relative strength, buoyed by AI enthusiasm elevating holdings like NVDA and robotics demand, amid sector rotation to growth tech. Its beta around 1.27 versus the S&P 500 amplifies upside in momentum environments, though with elevated volatility tied to tech cycles. PBD has displayed higher fluctuations, pressured by rate environments impacting renewables and mixed earnings from firms like PLUG, yet broader diversification mitigates deep drawdowns.

Over recent market cycles, BOTZ's concentrated positioning captures AI tailwinds more effectively, while PBD lags in rallies but offers stability via quarterly resets. Volatility differences stem from BOTZ's tech-heavy tilt versus PBD's utility buffer, with both sensitive to macro shifts like interest rates and innovation momentum.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and discovery process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors BOTZ due to its structural advantages, including lower costs, superior liquidity, larger scale, and alignment with persistent AI momentum. BOTZ's concentrated exposure to high-conviction leaders and consistent trend strength outweigh PBD's diversification amid prevailing sector rotations. While PBD holds appeal for clean energy recoveries, BOTZ exhibits a higher probability of outperformance in the near term based on observable momentum and efficiency metrics. This assessment reflects data patterns, not advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BOTZ vs. PBD commentary
Jun 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTZ is a Hold and PBD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOTZ has more net assets: 3.78B vs. PBD (234M). PBD has a higher annual dividend yield than BOTZ: PBD (39.812) vs BOTZ (12.172). BOTZ was incepted earlier than PBD: BOTZ (10 years) vs PBD (19 years). BOTZ (0.68) has a lower expense ratio than PBD (0.75). PBD has a higher turnover BOTZ (12.11) vs BOTZ (12.11).
BOTZPBDBOTZ / PBD
Gain YTD12.17239.81231%
Net Assets3.78B234M1,616%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.7591%
Turnover12.1149.0025%
Yield0.591.6336%
Fund Existence10 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTZPBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGCEX18.05N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Global Equity C
CDOZX44.89N/A
N/A
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Inst
BOSYX16.96N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val Y
FZAPX102.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel Z
SNWCX70.62N/A
N/A
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value C

BOTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOTZ has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOTZ jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOTZ
1D Price
Change %
BOTZ100%
+0.10%
NVDA - BOTZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
SERV - BOTZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.72%
WRD - BOTZ
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
HSAI - BOTZ
51%
Loosely correlated
+8.14%
SOUN - BOTZ
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.65%
More

PBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBD has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBD jumps, then MP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBD
1D Price
Change %
PBD100%
+0.45%
MP - PBD
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
BLDP - PBD
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
EVGO - PBD
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
SLDP - PBD
55%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
ACHR - PBD
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
More