BOTZ
Price
$36.64
Change
-$1.69 (-4.41%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
3.54B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBW
Price
$38.92
Change
-$2.30 (-5.58%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
560.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTZ vs PBW

BOTZ vs PBW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) vs. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) targets companies involved in robotics, automation, and artificial intelligence through a thematic index, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) focuses on clean energy innovators via the WilderHill Clean Energy Index.
  • BOTZ maintains a more concentrated portfolio with approximately 62 holdings and a higher expense ratio of 0.68%, compared to PBW’s broader diversification across roughly 70 holdings and a 0.64% expense ratio.
  • Sector exposure in BOTZ emphasizes technology and industrials with significant international allocation, whereas PBW allocates primarily to U.S.-listed clean energy and alternative power companies.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing strategies but differ in rebalancing frequency and weighting methodologies, influencing their risk and return profiles across market cycles.
  • Structural differences position BOTZ for exposure to technological adoption trends and PBW for alignment with energy transition and policy-driven themes.
  • Investors comparing these thematic vehicles should evaluate diversification, cost efficiency, and alignment with long-term sector momentum rather than short-term fluctuations.

Introduction

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) represent distinct thematic strategies within growth-oriented sectors. They do not compete directly but offer investors alternative pathways to capitalize on transformative trends—automation and artificial intelligence versus clean energy innovation. This comparison highlights their structural attributes, exposure profiles, and positioning to help investors assess suitability within diversified portfolios amid evolving macroeconomic and technological landscapes.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) Overview

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) seeks to track the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. The fund holds approximately 62 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.68%. Top holdings typically include companies such as Keyence Corp, ABB Ltd, Fanuc Corp, and NVIDIA Corp, reflecting a concentration in technology and industrials sectors. The portfolio features substantial international exposure, with holdings spanning robotics, industrial automation, and artificial intelligence applications. As a passively managed, full-replication thematic ETF, it rebalances periodically to align with index constituents, emphasizing companies positioned to benefit from increased adoption of these technologies.

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Overview

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) tracks the WilderHill Clean Energy Index and holds approximately 70 securities with an expense ratio of 0.64%. The fund employs a modified equal-weight methodology across clean energy companies, resulting in lower concentration in top holdings compared to many peers. Holdings focus on renewable energy, energy efficiency, and alternative power technologies, primarily U.S.-listed firms. PBW operates as a passively managed ETF with quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution, providing targeted exposure to the clean energy theme through a rules-based selection process that prioritizes innovation over market capitalization weighting.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within high-growth thematic sectors influenced by technological advancement, policy support, and shifting capital allocation. Robotics and artificial intelligence benefit from enterprise adoption, supply chain automation, and semiconductor demand, while clean energy responds to regulatory incentives, decarbonization goals, and infrastructure investments. Macro drivers include interest rate environments affecting capital-intensive projects, geopolitical considerations around energy security, and evolving fiscal policies. Sector risks encompass technological disruption, supply chain constraints, and sensitivity to broader economic cycles that influence corporate and government spending priorities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) has demonstrated sensitivity to technology sector rotation and earnings momentum among leading semiconductor and automation firms. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has shown responsiveness to policy announcements and commodity trends affecting renewable projects. Relative positioning highlights BOTZ’s higher concentration potentially amplifying volatility during tech-driven rallies, while PBW’s broader, equal-weighted approach may offer different risk characteristics amid energy transition shifts. Both have exhibited correlation with growth-oriented equities over longer periods, with performance influenced by sector-specific catalysts rather than isolated daily movements.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like BOTZ and PBW may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) due to its lower expense ratio, greater diversification across holdings, and alignment with sustained policy and transition momentum in the clean energy sector. Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) offers compelling exposure to high-growth technology themes but carries a higher cost and more concentrated risk profile. Final allocation decisions should reflect individual investor objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BOTZ vs. PBW commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTZ is a Hold and PBW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOTZ has more net assets: 3.54B vs. PBW (560M). PBW has a higher annual dividend yield than BOTZ: PBW (28.308) vs BOTZ (1.132). BOTZ was incepted earlier than PBW: BOTZ (10 years) vs PBW (21 years). PBW (0.64) has a lower expense ratio than BOTZ (0.68). PBW has a higher turnover BOTZ (12.11) vs BOTZ (12.11).
BOTZPBWBOTZ / PBW
Gain YTD1.13228.3084%
Net Assets3.54B560M631%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.64106%
Turnover12.1162.0020%
Yield0.590.6099%
Fund Existence10 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTZPBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIZD12.300.08
+0.65%
VanEck BDC Income ETF
TJAN28.08-0.03
-0.12%
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to January 2027
RWX26.30-0.11
-0.42%
State Street® SPDR® Dow Jones® IntlREETF
KEMQ25.17-0.99
-3.77%
KraneShares Em Mkts Cnsmr Tech ETF
SGRT36.29-2.14
-5.57%
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF

BOTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOTZ has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOTZ jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOTZ
1D Price
Change %
BOTZ100%
-4.41%
NVDA - BOTZ
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.13%
SERV - BOTZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-5.74%
WRD - BOTZ
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.64%
HSAI - BOTZ
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
SOUN - BOTZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-6.25%
More

PBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBW has been closely correlated with ENVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBW jumps, then ENVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBW
1D Price
Change %
PBW100%
-5.58%
ENVX - PBW
68%
Closely correlated
-10.35%
ACHR - PBW
67%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
QS - PBW
66%
Closely correlated
-2.50%
BLDP - PBW
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.47%
SLDP - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
More