Advertisement
BOXL vs SILC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOXL is a Hold and SILC is a StrongBuy.
BOXL | SILC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BOXL's Valuation (17) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SILC (58) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that BOXL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SILC’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as BOXL (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to BOXL’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's SMR Rating (93) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as BOXL (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to BOXL’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOXL (87) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOXL’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as BOXL (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to BOXL’s over the last 12 months.
| BOXL | SILC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 23 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BOXL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SILC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BOXL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SILC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BOXL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BOXL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SILC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BOXL (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -6.16% price change this week, while SILC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +3.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
BOXL is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
SILC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (-0.64% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
@Telecommunications Equipment (+2.67% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
Advertisement
BOXL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOXL has been loosely correlated with GMEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOXL jumps, then GMEX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOXL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOXL | 100% | -5.77% | ||
| GMEX - BOXL | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.25% | ||
| GPRO - BOXL | 29% Poorly correlated | +3.10% | ||
| MITQ - BOXL | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.98% | ||
| BOSC - BOXL | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SILC - BOXL | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.54% | ||
More | ||||
SILC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILC has been loosely correlated with HLIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SILC jumps, then HLIT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILC | 100% | +2.54% | ||
| HLIT - SILC | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| VIAV - SILC | 46% Loosely correlated | +6.82% | ||
| CRNT - SILC | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| HPE - SILC | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| OCC - SILC | 38% Loosely correlated | +4.71% | ||
More | ||||