It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BP (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -17.48% price change this week, while SLNG (@Integrated Oil) price change was -16.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -10.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.27%.
BP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
SLNG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
BP | SLNG | BP / SLNG | |
Capitalization | 106B | 77.9M | 136,072% |
EBITDA | 43.6B | 8.58M | 508,099% |
Gain YTD | -4.290 | -25.421 | 17% |
P/E Ratio | 7.37 | 419.00 | 2% |
Revenue | 210B | 73.1M | 287,278% |
Total Cash | 28.6B | 5.37M | 532,192% |
Total Debt | 63.1B | 9.61M | 656,335% |
BP | SLNG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 31 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SLNG's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as BP (98) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that SLNG’s stock grew similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.
BP's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNG (78) in the null industry. This means that BP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNG’s over the last 12 months.
SLNG's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as BP (84) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that SLNG’s stock grew similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.
BP's Price Growth Rating (80) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SLNG (85) in the null industry. This means that BP’s stock grew similarly to SLNG’s over the last 12 months.
BP's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLNG (100) in the null industry. This means that BP’s stock grew significantly faster than SLNG’s over the last 12 months.
BP | SLNG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago60% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago80% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IEGCX | 17.32 | N/A | N/A |
Invesco EQV Intl Small Company C | |||
ACFDX | 52.21 | N/A | N/A |
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr A | |||
GDLFX | 16.78 | N/A | N/A |
Gotham Defensive Long 500 Institutional | |||
GSPPX | 10.67 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth P | |||
MKVCX | 12.75 | N/A | N/A |
MFS International Large Cap Value C |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLNG and PBR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLNG and PBR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLNG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SLNG | 100% | +2.31% | ||
PBR - SLNG | 27% Poorly correlated | +6.54% | ||
IMO - SLNG | 20% Poorly correlated | +7.29% | ||
E - SLNG | 17% Poorly correlated | +6.63% | ||
BP - SLNG | 14% Poorly correlated | +6.86% | ||
TTE - SLNG | 14% Poorly correlated | +6.41% | ||
More |