Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPGIX vs FMDRX
BPGIX vs FMDRX Comparison
Open Charts BPGIX vs FMDRX
BPGIX vs FMDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPGIX vs. FMDRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPGIX is a Hold and FMDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 8.98B vs. BPGIX (315M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than BPGIX: FMDRX (1.82) vs BPGIX (1.71). BPGIX was incepted earlier than FMDRX: BPGIX (14 years) vs FMDRX (13 years). BPGIX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). BPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FMDRX (42.28). BPGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: BPGIX (100000) vs FMDRX (1000000). BPGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. FMDRX (3.31). BPGIX return over 5 years is better than : 54.22 vs. FMDRX (5.43).
| BPGIX | FMDRX | BPGIX / FMDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.89 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.89 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.167 | 0.561 | 1,098% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 8.98B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.82 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 3.31 | 346% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.65 | 15.38 | 329% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.22 | 5.43 | 999% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.98 | 24.92 | 546% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers