BPHLY
Price
$39.79
Change
-$2.81 (-6.60%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.4B
48 days until earnings call
CFBK
Price
$24.61
Change
+$0.06 (+0.24%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
158.29M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPHLY vs CFBK

Header iconBPHLY vs CFBK Comparison
Open Charts BPHLY vs CFBKBanner chart's image
Bank of the Philippine Islands
Price$39.79
Change-$2.81 (-6.60%)
Volume$602
Capitalization10.4B
CF Bankshares
Price$24.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
Volume$100
Capitalization158.29M
BPHLY vs CFBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPHLY vs. CFBK commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPHLY is a Hold and CFBK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BPHLY: $39.79 vs. CFBK: $24.55)
Brand notoriety: BPHLY and CFBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPHLY: 27% vs. CFBK: 93%
Market capitalization -- BPHLY: $10.4B vs. CFBK: $158.29M
BPHLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.4B. CFBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $158.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPHLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCFBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CFBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFBK is a better buy in the long-term than BPHLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPHLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFBK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPHLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CFBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BPHLY and CFBK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BPHLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CFBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

BPHLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

CFBK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPHLY($10.4B) has a higher market cap than CFBK($158M). BPHLY (9.30) and CFBK (8.86) have similar P/E ratio . CFBK YTD gains are higher at: -2.908 vs. BPHLY (-7.701). CFBK has less debt than BPHLY: CFBK (122M) vs BPHLY (227B). BPHLY has higher revenues than CFBK: BPHLY (181B) vs CFBK (55.5M).
BPHLYCFBKBPHLY / CFBK
Capitalization10.4B158M6,582%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.701-2.908265%
P/E Ratio9.308.86105%
Revenue181B55.5M326,126%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt227B122M186,066%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPHLY vs CFBK: Fundamental Ratings
BPHLY
CFBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3131
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFBK's Valuation (35) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPHLY (68) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BPHLY (31) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's SMR Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BPHLY (100) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BPHLY (81) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BPHLY (100) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPHLYCFBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCVT40.750.42
+1.03%
First Trust SSI Strat Convert Secs ETF
AMZP29.970.20
+0.68%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Amazon ETF
RDVI25.510.04
+0.16%
FT Vest Ris Div Ach Trg Inc ETF
GQRE61.04-0.05
-0.08%
FlexShares Glbl Quality Real Estate ETF
ASMH51.68-0.62
-1.19%
ASML HOLDING NV ADRHEDGED ASMH

BPHLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPHLY and BSSC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPHLY and BSSC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPHLY
1D Price
Change %
BPHLY100%
N/A
BSSC - BPHLY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLX - BPHLY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
CFBK - BPHLY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
FNWD - BPHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
MBCN - BPHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More

CFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFBK has been loosely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFBK jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFBK
1D Price
Change %
CFBK100%
+0.20%
WTFC - CFBK
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
WASH - CFBK
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
FCCO - CFBK
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
WSBC - CFBK
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
HIFS - CFBK
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
More