BPHLY
Price
$36.00
Change
+$0.40 (+1.12%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
9.35B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBCN
Price
$32.83
Change
+$0.64 (+1.99%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
260.32M
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPHLY vs MBCN

Header iconBPHLY vs MBCN Comparison
Open Charts BPHLY vs MBCNBanner chart's image
Bank of the Philippine Islands
Price$36.00
Change+$0.40 (+1.12%)
Volume$751
Capitalization9.35B
Middlefield Banc
Price$32.83
Change+$0.64 (+1.99%)
Volume$100
Capitalization260.32M
BPHLY vs MBCN Comparison Chart in %
BPHLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBCN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPHLY vs. MBCN commentary
Nov 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPHLY is a Hold and MBCN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BPHLY: $36.00 vs. MBCN: $32.19)
Brand notoriety: BPHLY and MBCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPHLY: 36% vs. MBCN: 64%
Market capitalization -- BPHLY: $9.35B vs. MBCN: $260.32M
BPHLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.35B. MBCN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $260.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPHLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBCN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the long-term than BPHLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPHLY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBCN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPHLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBCN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPHLY is a better buy in the short-term than MBCN.

Price Growth

BPHLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.42% price change this week, while MBCN (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

BPHLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

MBCN is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPHLY($9.35B) has a higher market cap than MBCN($260M). MBCN has higher P/E ratio than BPHLY: MBCN (12.64) vs BPHLY (8.70). MBCN YTD gains are higher at: 17.325 vs. BPHLY (-16.492). MBCN has less debt than BPHLY: MBCN (101M) vs BPHLY (227B). BPHLY has higher revenues than MBCN: BPHLY (181B) vs MBCN (72.8M).
BPHLYMBCNBPHLY / MBCN
Capitalization9.35B260M3,596%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.49217.325-95%
P/E Ratio8.7012.6469%
Revenue181B72.8M248,626%
Total CashN/A56.2M-
Total Debt227B101M224,752%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPHLY vs MBCN: Fundamental Ratings
BPHLY
MBCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9426
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5845
SMR RATING
1..100
152
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6276
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBCN's Valuation (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BPHLY (64) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew similarly to BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BPHLY (58) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew similarly to BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBCN (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BPHLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPHLY (80) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLY's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as MBCN (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BPHLY’s stock grew similarly to MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPHLYMBCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPHLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBCN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCD35.690.17
+0.49%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdLDSK1Fr ETF
FTCB21.380.02
+0.09%
First Trust Core Investment Grade ETF
TAPR25.58-0.02
-0.08%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prt ETF-2 Yr toApr2027
FGM57.43-1.00
-1.72%
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX® ETF
SOLR30.17-1.08
-3.47%
SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF

BPHLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPHLY and BSSC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPHLY and BSSC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPHLY
1D Price
Change %
BPHLY100%
+1.12%
BSSC - BPHLY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLX - BPHLY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
CFBK - BPHLY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
FNWD - BPHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
MBCN - BPHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
More