BPHLY
Price
$40.45
Change
-$6.90 (-14.57%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
41 days until earnings call
MBCN
Price
$29.78
Change
-$1.43 (-4.58%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BPHLY vs MBCN

Header iconBPHLY vs MBCN Comparison
Open Charts BPHLY vs MBCNBanner chart's image
Bank of the Philippine Islands
Price$40.45
Change-$6.90 (-14.57%)
Volume$336
CapitalizationN/A
Middlefield Banc
Price$29.78
Change-$1.43 (-4.58%)
Volume$23.46K
CapitalizationN/A
BPHLY vs MBCN Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPHLY vs. MBCN commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPHLY is a Hold and MBCN is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BPHLY: $40.45 vs. MBCN: $29.78)
Brand notoriety: BPHLY and MBCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPHLY: 17% vs. MBCN: 207%
Market capitalization -- BPHLY: $10.31B vs. MBCN: $192.69M
BPHLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.31B. MBCN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $192.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPHLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBCN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the long-term than BPHLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPHLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBCN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPHLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBCN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPHLY is a better buy in the short-term than MBCN.

Price Growth

BPHLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -14.57% price change this week, while MBCN (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

BPHLY is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

MBCN is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPHLY($10.3B) has a higher market cap than MBCN($193M). BPHLY has higher P/E ratio than MBCN: BPHLY (12.29) vs MBCN (11.34). BPHLY YTD gains are higher at: 14.605 vs. MBCN (-5.072). MBCN has less debt than BPHLY: MBCN (175M) vs BPHLY (99.7B). BPHLY has higher revenues than MBCN: BPHLY (125B) vs MBCN (71.9M).
BPHLYMBCNBPHLY / MBCN
Capitalization10.3B193M5,337%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.605-5.072-288%
P/E Ratio12.2911.34108%
Revenue125B71.9M173,853%
Total CashN/A56.2M-
Total Debt99.7B175M56,971%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPHLY vs MBCN: Fundamental Ratings
BPHLY
MBCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3810
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5452
SMR RATING
1..100
148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8227
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBCN's Valuation (73) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BPHLY (83) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew similarly to BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BPHLY (54) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew similarly to BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBCN (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BPHLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

BPHLY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MBCN (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BPHLY’s stock grew similarly to MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPHLY (82) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPHLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPHLYMBCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSENX19.95N/A
N/A
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets Y
PSCHX24.28N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Small Company R2
NFFFX80.32-1.84
-2.24%
American Funds New World F2
SSHFX47.32-1.19
-2.45%
Sound Shore Investor
SUPAX18.10-0.50
-2.69%
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Fund Class A

BPHLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPHLY and BSSC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPHLY and BSSC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPHLY
1D Price
Change %
BPHLY100%
-14.57%
BSSC - BPHLY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLX - BPHLY
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.84%
CFBK - BPHLY
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.72%
FNWD - BPHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.84%
MBCN - BPHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
More

MBCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBCN has been loosely correlated with BHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBCN jumps, then BHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBCN
1D Price
Change %
MBCN100%
-4.58%
BHB - MBCN
66%
Loosely correlated
-6.30%
RRBI - MBCN
66%
Loosely correlated
-4.58%
CBU - MBCN
65%
Loosely correlated
-6.16%
MCBS - MBCN
65%
Loosely correlated
-5.89%
PPBI - MBCN
65%
Loosely correlated
-6.21%
More