BPOSF
Price
$5.06
Change
-$0.89 (-14.96%)
Updated
Nov 27 closing price
Capitalization
515.42M
RLGT
Price
$5.92
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
279.09M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPOSF vs RLGT

Header iconBPOSF vs RLGT Comparison
Open Charts BPOSF vs RLGTBanner chart's image
Bpost SA
Price$5.06
Change-$0.89 (-14.96%)
Volume$200
Capitalization515.42M
Radiant Logistics
Price$5.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$37.73K
Capitalization279.09M
BPOSF vs RLGT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RLGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPOSF vs. RLGT commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPOSF is a Hold and RLGT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (BPOSF: $5.06 vs. RLGT: $5.92)
Brand notoriety: BPOSF and RLGT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Transportation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPOSF: 100% vs. RLGT: 29%
Market capitalization -- BPOSF: $515.42M vs. RLGT: $279.09M
BPOSF [@Other Transportation] is valued at $515.42M. RLGT’s [@Other Transportation] market capitalization is $279.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Transportation] industry ranges from $73.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Transportation] industry is $9.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPOSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRLGT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPOSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RLGT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPOSF is a better buy in the long-term than RLGT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RLGT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RLGT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BPOSF (@Other Transportation) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RLGT (@Other Transportation) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

RLGT is expected to report earnings on Sep 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Transportation (+1.96% weekly)

Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPOSF($515M) has a higher market cap than RLGT($279M). RLGT has higher P/E ratio than BPOSF: RLGT (16.91) vs BPOSF (8.35). BPOSF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. RLGT (-11.642). BPOSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 547M vs. RLGT (41.8M). BPOSF has more cash in the bank: 781M vs. RLGT (19M). RLGT has less debt than BPOSF: RLGT (78.9M) vs BPOSF (2.56B). BPOSF has higher revenues than RLGT: BPOSF (4.45B) vs RLGT (888M).
BPOSFRLGTBPOSF / RLGT
Capitalization515M279M185%
EBITDA547M41.8M1,309%
Gain YTD0.000-11.642-
P/E Ratio8.3516.9149%
Revenue4.45B888M501%
Total Cash781M19M4,111%
Total Debt2.56B78.9M3,247%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPOSF vs RLGT: Fundamental Ratings
BPOSF
RLGT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
9676
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7175
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPOSF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RLGT (54) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that BPOSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RLGT’s over the last 12 months.

RLGT's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPOSF (100) in the null industry. This means that RLGT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPOSF’s over the last 12 months.

RLGT's SMR Rating (76) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as BPOSF (96) in the null industry. This means that RLGT’s stock grew similarly to BPOSF’s over the last 12 months.

BPOSF's Price Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as RLGT (75) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that BPOSF’s stock grew similarly to RLGT’s over the last 12 months.

BPOSF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RLGT (97) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that BPOSF’s stock grew significantly faster than RLGT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPOSFRLGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RLGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRLVX24.930.24
+0.97%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R5
RYCYX142.131.30
+0.92%
Rydex Dow 2x Strategy C
SBPLX30.070.14
+0.47%
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy C
NOEMX13.30-0.02
-0.15%
Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index
IPOIX22.17-0.12
-0.54%
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq I

BPOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPOSF and BPOSY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPOSF and BPOSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPOSF
1D Price
Change %
BPOSF100%
N/A
BPOSY - BPOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATXG - BPOSF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
RLGT - BPOSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYRX - BPOSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.80%
CGJTF - BPOSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RLGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RLGT has been loosely correlated with HUBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RLGT jumps, then HUBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLGT
1D Price
Change %
RLGT100%
N/A
HUBG - RLGT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
JBHT - RLGT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
XPO - RLGT
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FDX - RLGT
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
FWRD - RLGT
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
More