BPPPF
Price
$23.43
Change
-$1.53 (-6.13%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
MSHXF
Price
$32.40
Change
-$5.55 (-14.62%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Ad is loading...

BPPPF vs MSHXF

Header iconBPPPF vs MSHXF Comparison
Open Charts BPPPF vs MSHXFBanner chart's image
Bid
Price$23.43
Change-$1.53 (-6.13%)
Volume$525
CapitalizationN/A
Mitsubishi Shokuhin
Price$32.40
Change-$5.55 (-14.62%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BPPPF vs MSHXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPPPF vs. MSHXF commentary
Dec 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPPPF is a StrongSell and MSHXF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2024
Stock price -- (BPPPF: $23.43 vs. MSHXF: $32.40)
Brand notoriety: BPPPF and MSHXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPPPF: 101% vs. MSHXF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BPPPF: $8.14B vs. MSHXF: $1.16B
BPPPF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $8.14B. MSHXF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSHXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSHXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSHXF is a better buy in the long-term than BPPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPPPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSHXF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPPPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MSHXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPPPF is a better buy in the short-term than MSHXF.

Price Growth

BPPPF (@Food Distributors) experienced а -6.14% price change this week, while MSHXF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-0.80% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPPPF($8.14B) has a higher market cap than MSHXF($1.17B). BPPPF has higher P/E ratio than MSHXF: BPPPF (19.89) vs MSHXF (8.72). MSHXF YTD gains are higher at: 20.401 vs. BPPPF (4.825). MSHXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.1B vs. BPPPF (14.6B). BPPPF has more cash in the bank: 8.09B vs. MSHXF (583M). MSHXF has less debt than BPPPF: MSHXF (6.6B) vs BPPPF (21.6B). MSHXF has higher revenues than BPPPF: MSHXF (1.95T) vs BPPPF (218B).
BPPPFMSHXFBPPPF / MSHXF
Capitalization8.14B1.17B698%
EBITDA14.6B25.1B58%
Gain YTD4.82520.40124%
P/E Ratio19.898.72228%
Revenue218B1.95T11%
Total Cash8.09B583M1,388%
Total Debt21.6B6.6B328%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPPPF: Fundamental Ratings
BPPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
23

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPPPFMSHXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KLGCX41.870.47
+1.14%
NYLI WMC Growth Class C
HNCJX17.110.14
+0.82%
Hartford International Growth I
GCECX16.600.12
+0.73%
AB Global Core Equity C
JDBAX46.000.17
+0.37%
Janus Henderson Balanced A
GMAEX21.980.08
+0.37%
GMO Quality Cyclicals VI

BPPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPPPF and MSHXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPPPF and MSHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPPPF
1D Price
Change %
BPPPF100%
N/A
MSHXF - BPPPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFFG - BPPPF
12%
Poorly correlated
-4.91%
COLFF - BPPPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
BZLFY - BPPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
IVFH - BPPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
More

MSHXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSHXF and BPPPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSHXF and BPPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSHXF
1D Price
Change %
MSHXF100%
N/A
BPPPF - MSHXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTWF - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OGOFF - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCLE - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More