Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPTRX vs CGFAX
BPTRX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BPTRX vs CGFAX
BPTRX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPTRX vs. CGFAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPTRX is a Buy and CGFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. BPTRX (16.5B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BPTRX: CGFAX (0.24) vs BPTRX (0.00). BPTRX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BPTRX (23 years) vs CGFAX (25 years). BPTRX (1.91) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BPTRX (5.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPTRX: CGFAX (250) vs BPTRX (2000). BPTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.75 vs. CGFAX (5.42). BPTRX return over 5 years is better than : 61.44 vs. CGFAX (17.11).
| BPTRX | CGFAX | BPTRX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.707 | 9.418 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.5B | 342B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.75 | 5.42 | 696% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.73 | 46.86 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.44 | 17.11 | 359% |
| Returns for 10 years | 613.55 | 105.74 | 580% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement