Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPTRX vs RGACX
BPTRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BPTRX vs RGACX
BPTRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPTRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPTRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. BPTRX (14.9B). BPTRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BPTRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BPTRX (23 years) vs RGACX (24 years). BPTRX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BPTRX (5.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPTRX: RGACX (250) vs BPTRX (2000). BPTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.63 vs. RGACX (-0.99). BPTRX return over 5 years is better than : 45.35 vs. RGACX (9.02).
| BPTRX | RGACX | BPTRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.93 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.93 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.038 | 4.080 | -74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.9B | 357B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.63 | -0.99 | -2,174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.33 | 31.83 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.35 | 9.02 | 503% |
| Returns for 10 years | 551.52 | 90.63 | 609% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement