Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPTRX vs RGACX
BPTRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BPTRX vs RGACX
BPTRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPTRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPTRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BPTRX (19.1B). BPTRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BPTRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BPTRX (23 years) vs RGACX (24 years). BPTRX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BPTRX (5.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPTRX: RGACX (250) vs BPTRX (2000). BPTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.19 vs. RGACX (11.59). BPTRX return over 5 years is better than : 73.38 vs. RGACX (19.23).
| BPTRX | RGACX | BPTRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.93 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.93 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.473 | 9.116 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1B | 361B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.19 | 11.59 | 407% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.61 | 45.05 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.38 | 19.23 | 382% |
| Returns for 10 years | 695.94 | 107.89 | 645% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers