Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPTRX vs RGAGX
BPTRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BPTRX vs RGAGX
BPTRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPTRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPTRX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BPTRX (19.1B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BPTRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs BPTRX (0.00). BPTRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BPTRX (23 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). BPTRX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BPTRX (5.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPTRX: RGAGX (250) vs BPTRX (2000). BPTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.19 vs. RGAGX (12.74). BPTRX return over 5 years is better than : 73.38 vs. RGAGX (23.74).
| BPTRX | RGAGX | BPTRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.29 | 659% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.29 | 659% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.473 | 9.458 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1B | 361B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.19 | 12.74 | 370% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.61 | 47.47 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.38 | 23.74 | 309% |
| Returns for 10 years | 695.94 | 117.20 | 594% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement