BPYPO
Price
$15.07
Change
-$0.30 (-1.95%)
Updated
Mar 3, 04:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
FSV
Price
$175.85
Change
-$0.58 (-0.33%)
Updated
Mar 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.45B
51 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BPYPO vs FSV

Header iconBPYPO vs FSV Comparison
Open Charts BPYPO vs FSVBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$15.07
Change-$0.30 (-1.95%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
FirstService
Price$175.85
Change-$0.58 (-0.33%)
Volume$700
Capitalization7.45B
BPYPO vs FSV Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPYPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPO vs. FSV commentary
Mar 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPO is a StrongBuy and FSV is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 03, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPO: $15.37 vs. FSV: $176.43)
Brand notoriety: BPYPO and FSV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPO: 110% vs. FSV: 180%
Market capitalization -- BPYPO: $0 vs. FSV: $7.45B
BPYPO [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. FSV’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $7.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPO is a better buy in the long-term than FSV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSV is a better buy in the short-term than BPYPO.

Price Growth

BPYPO (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while FSV (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSV is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.40% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPYPO YTD gains are higher at: 13.015 vs. FSV (-2.536). BPYPO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3B vs. FSV (379M). BPYPO has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. FSV (188M). FSV has less debt than BPYPO: FSV (1.42B) vs BPYPO (71B). BPYPO has higher revenues than FSV: BPYPO (9.48B) vs FSV (4.34B).
BPYPOFSVBPYPO / FSV
CapitalizationN/A7.45B-
EBITDA3B379M790%
Gain YTD13.015-2.536-513%
P/E RatioN/A73.74-
Revenue9.48B4.34B219%
Total Cash2.34B188M1,245%
Total Debt71B1.42B5,011%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSV: Fundamental Ratings
FSV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPOFSV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPYPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEPT31.000.29
+0.94%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Sep ETF
RAYD33.540.26
+0.79%
Rayliant Quantitative Dev Mkt Eq ETF
FMHI48.80-0.04
-0.08%
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
AVDV67.48-0.36
-0.53%
Avantis International Small Cap Val ETF
PBW17.56-0.29
-1.62%
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

BPYPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPO has been closely correlated with BPYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BPYPO jumps, then BPYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPO
1D Price
Change %
BPYPO100%
-0.32%
BPYPP - BPYPO
71%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
BPYPN - BPYPO
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
FSV - BPYPO
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
NMRK - BPYPO
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
OPAD - BPYPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
More

FSV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been loosely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSV
1D Price
Change %
FSV100%
+0.13%
CIGI - FSV
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
CBRE - FSV
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
JLL - FSV
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
NMRK - FSV
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
MMI - FSV
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
More