Advertisement
CBRE vs FSV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBRE is a Hold and FSV is a Hold.
CBRE's RSI Indicator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for CBRE moved out of oversold territory on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 24 of the 29 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 83%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CBRE as a result. In 58 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CBRE just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where CBRE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Following a +2.97% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CBRE advanced for three days, in 205 of 316 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 36 of 71 cases where CBRE's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 51%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CBRE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
CBRE broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CBRE entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CBRE’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 84 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.643) is normal, around the industry mean (2.177). P/E Ratio (30.602) is within average values for comparable stocks, (55.145). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.695) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.105) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.944) is also within normal values, averaging (5.807).
Momentum Indicator for FSV turns positive, indicating new upward trend
FSV saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 102 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 58 of the 102 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 57%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FSV's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 40 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FSV just turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where FSV's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 20 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 45%.
FSV moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +3.84% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FSV advanced for three days, in 160 of 303 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FSV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
FSV broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FSV entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FSV’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 86 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.897) is normal, around the industry mean (2.130). P/E Ratio (38.585) is within average values for comparable stocks, (53.856). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.780) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.104) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.083) is also within normal values, averaging (5.807).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FSV’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
CBRE | FSV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBRE's Valuation (84) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FSV (86). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to FSV’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSV (100). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSV’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FSV (61). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to FSV’s over the last 12 months.
FSV's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (60). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FSV (80). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to FSV’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | FSV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 29 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 2 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FSV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CBRE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBRE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FSV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +4.49% price change this week, while FSV (@Real Estate Development) price change was +4.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
FSV is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-1.15% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
Advertisement
CBRE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | -2.53% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 88% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 85% Closely correlated | +4.49% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 82% Closely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 73% Closely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 68% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||
FSV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been loosely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSV | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| CBRE - FSV | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CIGI - FSV | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| CWK - FSV | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| NMRK - FSV | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| COMP - FSV | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
More | ||||