CIGI
Price
$89.78
Change
-$1.69 (-1.85%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.6B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSV
Price
$129.16
Change
+$0.65 (+0.51%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.64B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIGI vs FSV

CIGI vs FSV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIGI vs. FSV commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIGI is a StrongBuy and FSV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIGI vs FSV: Fundamental Ratings
CIGI
FSV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1122
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7861
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7674
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8485
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSV's Valuation (82) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CIGI (92). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CIGI (100). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's SMR Rating (61) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CIGI (78). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Price Growth Rating (74) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CIGI (76). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.

CIGI's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FSV (85). This means that CIGI’s stock grew similarly to FSV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIGIFSV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (CIGI: $91.47 vs. FSV: $128.51)
Brand notoriety: CIGI and FSV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIGI: 119% vs. FSV: 67%
Market capitalization -- CIGI: $4.6B vs. FSV: $5.64B
CIGI [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $4.6B. FSV’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $5.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $487 to $63.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $2.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIGI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FSV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CIGI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSV is a better buy in the long-term than CIGI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIGI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIGI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIGI is a better buy in the short-term than FSV.

Price Growth

CIGI (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.82% price change this week, while FSV (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIGI is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

FSV is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-2.77% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CIGI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBMX23.490.20
+0.84%
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMX)
DXUV67.410.30
+0.45%
Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV)
SRHR54.86N/A
N/A
SRH REIT Covered Call ETF (SRHR)
GNR73.76-0.21
-0.28%
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR)
IGA9.97-0.04
-0.40%
Voya Global Advantage AND Premium Opportunity Fund

FSV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been loosely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSV
1D Price
Change %
FSV100%
+0.49%
CBRE - FSV
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
CIGI - FSV
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
CWK - FSV
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
JLL - FSV
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
COMP - FSV
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
More