BQ
Price
$0.96
Change
-$0.04 (-4.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SVV
Price
$10.75
Change
+$0.28 (+2.67%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.65B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQ vs SVV

BQ vs SVV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQ vs. SVV commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQ is a Hold and SVV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BQ: $0.96 vs. SVV: $10.75)
Brand notoriety: BQ and SVV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQ: 1% vs. SVV: 94%
Market capitalization -- BQ: $7.08M vs. SVV: $1.65B
BQ [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $7.08M. SVV’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $52.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVV is a better buy in the long-term than BQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQ’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQ’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BQ is a better buy in the short-term than SVV.

Price Growth

BQ (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -13.51% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

SVV is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.63% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVV($1.65B) has a higher market cap than BQ($7.08M). SVV YTD gains are higher at: 15.096 vs. BQ (-52.709). SVV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 179M vs. BQ (-38.14M). SVV has higher revenues than BQ: SVV (1.71B) vs BQ (469M).
BQSVVBQ / SVV
Capitalization7.08M1.65B0%
EBITDA-38.14M179M-21%
Gain YTD-52.70915.096-349%
P/E RatioN/A71.67-
Revenue469M1.71B27%
Total CashN/A61.6M-
Total DebtN/A1.41B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BQ: Fundamental Ratings
BQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
99
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQSVV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMST1.070.15
+16.30%
Amesite
ADCT1.000.04
+3.80%
ADC Therapeutics SA
ASC18.400.21
+1.15%
ARDMORE SHIPPING Corp
XYL113.42-0.02
-0.02%
Xylem
LIF44.66-1.16
-2.53%
Life360 Inc Common Stock

BQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQ has been loosely correlated with SVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQ jumps, then SVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQ
1D Price
Change %
BQ100%
-4.00%
SVV - BQ
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
ZOOZ - BQ
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
RDNW - BQ
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KWY - BQ
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
UXIN - BQ
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.35%
More