BQCNF
Price
$118.46
Change
+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
9.98B
EDVR
Price
$15.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
35.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQCNF vs EDVR

Header iconBQCNF vs EDVR Comparison
Open Charts BQCNF vs EDVRBanner chart's image
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
Price$118.46
Change+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Volume$300
Capitalization9.98B
Endeavor Ban
Price$15.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization35.02M
BQCNF vs EDVR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQCNF vs. EDVR commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQCNF is a Buy and EDVR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BQCNF: $118.46 vs. EDVR: $15.00)
Brand notoriety: BQCNF and EDVR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQCNF: 207% vs. EDVR: 2%
Market capitalization -- BQCNF: $9.98B vs. EDVR: $35.02M
BQCNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.98B. EDVR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $35.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQCNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEDVR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BQCNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EDVR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EDVR is a better buy in the long-term than BQCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQCNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EDVR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQCNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EDVR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BQCNF is a better buy in the short-term than EDVR.

Price Growth

BQCNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EDVR (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQCNF($9.98B) has a higher market cap than EDVR($35M). BQCNF has higher P/E ratio than EDVR: BQCNF (25.15) vs EDVR (9.11). EDVR YTD gains are higher at: 24.390 vs. BQCNF (-15.386). EDVR has less debt than BQCNF: EDVR (16.1M) vs BQCNF (8.08B). BQCNF has higher revenues than EDVR: BQCNF (1.08B) vs EDVR (19.2M).
BQCNFEDVRBQCNF / EDVR
Capitalization9.98B35M28,500%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.38624.390-63%
P/E Ratio25.159.11276%
Revenue1.08B19.2M5,635%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.08B16.1M50,174%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BQCNF vs EDVR: Fundamental Ratings
BQCNF
EDVR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4896
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5632
SMR RATING
1..100
1583
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
545
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDVR's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (95). This means that EDVR’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

EDVR's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (56). This means that EDVR’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

BQCNF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EDVR (83). This means that BQCNF’s stock grew significantly faster than EDVR’s over the last 12 months.

EDVR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (56). This means that EDVR’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

EDVR's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (54). This means that EDVR’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQCNFEDVR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNYZF0.680.04
+5.43%
Tiny Ltd.
ALOD0.08N/A
N/A
Allied Resources, Inc.
DWAHF33.53N/A
N/A
Daiwa House Industry Co. Ltd.
PUBC0.10N/A
N/A
Purebase Corporation
BWAGF124.70N/A
N/A
BAWAG Group AG

BQCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQCNF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQCNF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQCNF
1D Price
Change %
BQCNF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BQCNF
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVR - BQCNF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - BQCNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - BQCNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - BQCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EDVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDVR has been loosely correlated with PVBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDVR jumps, then PVBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDVR
1D Price
Change %
EDVR100%
N/A
PVBK - EDVR
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BQCNF - EDVR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - EDVR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOY - EDVR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYBC - EDVR
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
More