Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQMGX vs FSMAX
BQMGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BQMGX vs FSMAX
BQMGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BQMGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQMGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. BQMGX (96.3M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BQMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BQMGX (0.02). BQMGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BQMGX (16 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BQMGX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BQMGX (16.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQMGX: FSMAX (0) vs BQMGX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.08 vs. BQMGX (-5.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.47 vs. BQMGX (-6.54).
| BQMGX | FSMAX | BQMGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.04 | 2,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.04 | 2,343% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.251 | 14.890 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.3M | 42.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.50 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.48 | 30.08 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.54 | 73.38 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.54 | 37.47 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.98 | 143.95 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement