Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQMGX vs FSMAX
BQMGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BQMGX vs FSMAX
BQMGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BQMGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQMGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BQMGX (97.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BQMGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs BQMGX (0.02). BQMGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BQMGX (16 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BQMGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BQMGX (16.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQMGX: FSMAX (0) vs BQMGX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. BQMGX (-9.45). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. BQMGX (-12.34).
| BQMGX | FSMAX | BQMGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.04 | 2,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.04 | 2,314% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.934 | 13.370 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.1M | 40.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.49 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.45 | 13.05 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.11 | 63.92 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.34 | 32.77 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.25 | 133.42 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement