BRC
Price
$90.40
Change
+$0.24 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.26B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FA
Price
$20.58
Change
+$1.04 (+5.32%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.53B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRC vs FA

BRC vs FA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRC vs. FA commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRC is a Buy and FA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BRC: $90.40 vs. FA: $20.58)
Brand notoriety: BRC and FA are both not notable
BRC represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services, while FA is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRC: 34% vs. FA: 58%
Market capitalization -- BRC: $4.26B vs. FA: $3.53B
BRC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $4.26B. FA’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $3.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $1.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRC is a better buy in the long-term than FA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRC is a better buy in the short-term than FA.

Price Growth

BRC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -1.74% price change this week, while FA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -5.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +96.03%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRC is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.

FA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-5.18% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-3.35% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRC($4.26B) has a higher market cap than FA($3.53B). FA has higher P/E ratio than BRC: FA (411.20) vs BRC (20.55). FA YTD gains are higher at: 41.638 vs. BRC (16.355). FA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 406M vs. BRC (313M). FA has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. BRC (175M). BRC has less debt than FA: BRC (88.5M) vs FA (2.07B). BRC (1.62B) and FA (1.61B) have equivalent revenues.
BRCFABRC / FA
Capitalization4.26B3.53B121%
EBITDA313M406M77%
Gain YTD16.35541.63839%
P/E Ratio20.55411.205%
Revenue1.62B1.61B101%
Total Cash175M226M77%
Total Debt88.5M2.07B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRC: Fundamental Ratings
BRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRCFA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MZZ6.040.08
+1.34%
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
RWL130.730.45
+0.35%
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
YLD18.89-0.04
-0.21%
Principal Active High Yield ETF
EMBX50.91-0.29
-0.57%
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
SPPP12.83-0.24
-1.84%
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust

BRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRC has been loosely correlated with CASS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRC jumps, then CASS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRC
1D Price
Change %
BRC100%
+0.27%
CASS - BRC
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
GHC - BRC
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
ABM - BRC
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
AZZ - BRC
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
FA - BRC
47%
Loosely correlated
+5.32%
More

FA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FA has been loosely correlated with CBZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FA jumps, then CBZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FA
1D Price
Change %
FA100%
+5.32%
CBZ - FA
48%
Loosely correlated
+7.09%
BCO - FA
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
BRC - FA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
MSA - FA
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
ARLO - FA
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More