BRC
Price
$86.06
Change
+$0.95 (+1.12%)
Updated
Jun 23, 03:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.01B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FA
Price
$16.56
Change
+$0.43 (+2.67%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.77B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRC vs FA

BRC vs FA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRC vs. FA commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRC is a Buy and FA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BRC: $85.11 vs. FA: $16.12)
Brand notoriety: BRC and FA are both not notable
BRC represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services, while FA is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRC: 59% vs. FA: 107%
Market capitalization -- BRC: $4.01B vs. FA: $2.77B
BRC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $4.01B. FA’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $1.88B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $6.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRC is a better buy in the long-term than FA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRC is a better buy in the short-term than FA.

Price Growth

BRC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +0.64% price change this week, while FA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -5.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.13%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRC is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.

FA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-4.23% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.93% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRC($4.01B) has a higher market cap than FA($2.77B). FA has higher P/E ratio than BRC: FA (322.40) vs BRC (19.34). FA YTD gains are higher at: 10.943 vs. BRC (9.246). FA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 406M vs. BRC (313M). FA has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. BRC (175M). BRC has less debt than FA: BRC (88.5M) vs FA (2.07B). BRC (1.62B) and FA (1.61B) have equivalent revenues.
BRCFABRC / FA
Capitalization4.01B2.77B145%
EBITDA313M406M77%
Gain YTD9.24610.94384%
P/E Ratio19.34322.406%
Revenue1.62B1.61B101%
Total Cash175M226M77%
Total Debt88.5M2.07B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRC: Fundamental Ratings
BRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRCFA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DXJ179.751.24
+0.69%
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity ETF
SAUG27.720.07
+0.25%
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Aug
ULST40.38-0.01
-0.01%
State Street® Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
MDEV18.48-0.13
-0.70%
First Trust Indxx Global Mdcl Dvcs ETF
WDGF30.99-0.70
-2.21%
WisdomTree Global Defense Fund

BRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRC has been loosely correlated with CASS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRC jumps, then CASS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRC
1D Price
Change %
BRC100%
-0.23%
CASS - BRC
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
GHC - BRC
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
ABM - BRC
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
AZZ - BRC
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
FA - BRC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
More

FA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FA has been loosely correlated with CBZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FA jumps, then CBZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FA
1D Price
Change %
FA100%
+0.31%
CBZ - FA
48%
Loosely correlated
-7.85%
BCO - FA
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
BRC - FA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
MSA - FA
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
ARLO - FA
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More