BRDCF
Price
$43.06
Change
+$2.56 (+6.32%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
28.65B
DAN
Price
$17.13
Change
-$0.15 (-0.87%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDCF vs DAN

Header iconBRDCF vs DAN Comparison
Open Charts BRDCF vs DANBanner chart's image
Bridgestone
Price$43.06
Change+$2.56 (+6.32%)
Volume$200
Capitalization28.65B
Dana
Price$17.13
Change-$0.15 (-0.87%)
Volume$3.3M
Capitalization1.83B
BRDCF vs DAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDCF vs. DAN commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDCF is a Hold and DAN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDCF: $43.06 vs. DAN: $17.13)
Brand notoriety: BRDCF and DAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDCF: 11% vs. DAN: 181%
Market capitalization -- BRDCF: $28.65B vs. DAN: $1.83B
BRDCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $28.65B. DAN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDAN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the long-term than DAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DAN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BRDCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +6.32% price change this week, while DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.25% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDCF($28.6B) has a higher market cap than DAN($1.83B). DAN has higher P/E ratio than BRDCF: DAN (48.62) vs BRDCF (12.56). DAN YTD gains are higher at: 50.169 vs. BRDCF (19.644). BRDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793B vs. DAN (748M). BRDCF has more cash in the bank: 526B vs. DAN (529M). DAN has less debt than BRDCF: DAN (2.98B) vs BRDCF (802B). BRDCF has higher revenues than DAN: BRDCF (4.26T) vs DAN (10.6B).
BRDCFDANBRDCF / DAN
Capitalization28.6B1.83B1,561%
EBITDA793B748M106,016%
Gain YTD19.64450.16939%
P/E Ratio12.5648.6226%
Revenue4.26T10.6B40,217%
Total Cash526B529M99,433%
Total Debt802B2.98B26,904%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRDCF vs DAN: Fundamental Ratings
BRDCF
DAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8953
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4574
SMR RATING
1..100
6490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRDCF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as DAN (36) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as DAN (74) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as DAN (90) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as BRDCF (48) in the null industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as BRDCF (28) in the null industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIEX32.270.34
+1.06%
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG Instl
ADVDX4.530.02
+0.44%
abrdn Dynamic Dividend Instl
VGSLX125.450.39
+0.31%
Vanguard Real Estate Index Admiral
ASIMX13.580.02
+0.15%
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth I
LBFIX56.510.08
+0.14%
ClearBridge Select I

BRDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRDCF and WLMTF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRDCF and WLMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDCF
1D Price
Change %
BRDCF100%
N/A
WLMTF - BRDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.19%
BRDCY - BRDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
MOD - BRDCF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
SRI - BRDCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.12%
DAN - BRDCF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
More