DAN
Price
$30.16
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LEA
Price
$124.14
Change
+$0.49 (+0.40%)
Updated
Aug 26, 10:51 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.1B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAN vs LEA

DAN vs LEA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAN vs. LEA commentary
Aug 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAN is a Buy and LEA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2026
Stock price -- (DAN: $30.16 vs. LEA: $123.65)
Brand notoriety: DAN and LEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAN: 78% vs. LEA: 74%
Market capitalization -- DAN: $3.24B vs. LEA: $6.1B
DAN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.24B. LEA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $6.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $73.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DAN is a better buy in the long-term than LEA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DAN and LEA are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.05% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

LEA is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.99% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($6.1B) has a higher market cap than DAN($3.25B). DAN has higher P/E ratio than LEA: DAN (71.32) vs LEA (11.51). DAN YTD gains are higher at: 28.382 vs. LEA (9.148). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.44B vs. DAN (569M). LEA has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. DAN (419M). DAN has less debt than LEA: DAN (1.54B) vs LEA (2.75B). LEA has higher revenues than DAN: LEA (23.7B) vs DAN (7.66B).
DANLEADAN / LEA
Capitalization3.25B6.1B53%
EBITDA569M1.44B40%
Gain YTD28.3829.148310%
P/E Ratio71.3211.51619%
Revenue7.66B23.7B32%
Total Cash419M1B42%
Total Debt1.54B2.75B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAN vs LEA: Fundamental Ratings
DAN
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
287
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
1768
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4962
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7578
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as DAN (18). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEA (100). This means that DAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEA’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's SMR Rating (17) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEA (68). This means that DAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEA’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (62). This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (78). This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DANLEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQP214.842.76
+1.30%
Tradr 2X Long Innovation100 QuarterlyETF
VWO60.640.67
+1.12%
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
BBN15.910.16
+1.02%
BlackRock Taxable Municipal
DEMZ48.060.23
+0.49%
Democratic Large Cap Core ETF
DBO20.87-0.88
-4.05%
Invesco DB Oil

DAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAN has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAN jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAN
1D Price
Change %
DAN100%
+0.03%
LEA - DAN
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
PHIN - DAN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
BWA - DAN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
DCH - DAN
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
MGA - DAN
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
More