Ad is loading...
BRDG
Price
$9.57
Change
+$0.02 (+0.21%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
101 days until earnings call
CWD
Price
$0.58
Change
+$0.08 (+16.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

BRDG vs CWD

Header iconBRDG vs CWD Comparison
Open Charts BRDG vs CWDBanner chart's image
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$9.57
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
Volume$224.7K
CapitalizationN/A
CaliberCos
Price$0.58
Change+$0.08 (+16.00%)
Volume$229.26K
CapitalizationN/A
BRDG vs CWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDG vs. CWD commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDG is a Sell and CWD is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BRDG: $9.57 vs. CWD: $0.58)
Brand notoriety: BRDG and CWD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDG: 87% vs. CWD: 375%
Market capitalization -- BRDG: $280.98M vs. CWD: $21.92M
BRDG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $280.98M. CWD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $21.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the long-term than CWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BRDG and CWD are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BRDG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.18% price change this week, while CWD (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

CWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDG($281M) has a higher market cap than CWD($21.9M). CWD has higher P/E ratio than BRDG: CWD (192.31) vs BRDG (26.30). BRDG YTD gains are higher at: 1.954 vs. CWD (-55.357). CWD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -14.01M vs. BRDG (-36.42M). BRDG has more cash in the bank: 77.5M vs. CWD (5.53M). CWD has less debt than BRDG: CWD (227M) vs BRDG (484M). BRDG has higher revenues than CWD: BRDG (391M) vs CWD (88.5M).
BRDGCWDBRDG / CWD
Capitalization281M21.9M1,283%
EBITDA-36.42M-14.01M260%
Gain YTD1.954-55.357-4%
P/E Ratio26.30192.3114%
Revenue391M88.5M442%
Total Cash77.5M5.53M1,401%
Total Debt484M227M213%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDGCWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNUEX10.21-0.01
-0.10%
UBS International Sustainable Equity P
IVIFX17.78-0.14
-0.78%
Delaware Ivy International Core Eq C
OWLLX11.45-0.09
-0.78%
Channing Intrinsic Value Sm-Cp Instl
QISGX28.13-0.55
-1.92%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth IS
LEGCX52.21-1.17
-2.19%
Columbia Large Cap Growth C

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been loosely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then BX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
+0.21%
BX - BRDG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
NXDT - BRDG
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
CG - BRDG
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
IVZ - BRDG
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
PAX - BRDG
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
More

CWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWD and BRDG have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWD and BRDG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWD
1D Price
Change %
CWD100%
+15.06%
BRDG - CWD
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
CRBG - CWD
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
ALTI - CWD
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
CIXXF - CWD
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
BX - CWD
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
More