Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLN
BRF vs FLN Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLN
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$15.02
Change+$0.11 (+0.74%)
Volume$8.33K
Net Assets19.65M
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$20.00
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
Volume$4.52K
Net Assets15.97M
BRF vs FLN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLN commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Buy and FLN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRF has more net assets: 19.7M vs. FLN (16M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLN: BRF (36.601) vs FLN (34.355). BRF was incepted earlier than FLN: BRF (16 years) vs FLN (14 years). BRF (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than FLN (0.80). FLN has a higher turnover BRF (30.00) vs BRF (30.00).
| BRF | FLN | BRF / FLN | |
| Gain YTD | 36.601 | 34.355 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 19.7M | 16M | 123% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.80 | 75% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 75.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 3.15 | 3.98 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
| CBDBY - BRF | 11% Poorly correlated | -5.88% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| KAR - BRF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||
FLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLN has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLN jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLN | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| BAP - FLN | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| NU - FLN | 49% Loosely correlated | +9.08% | ||
| LTM - FLN | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| OMAB - FLN | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| PAGS - FLN | 37% Loosely correlated | +3.20% | ||
More | ||||